• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在瑞典新报销计划的卫生技术评估后,降低血糖治疗的利用和成本。

Utilization and costs of glucose lowering therapies following health technology assessment for the new reimbursement scheme in Sweden.

机构信息

The Center for Medical Technology Assessment, CMT Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2012 Dec;108(2-3):207-15. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.10.008. Epub 2012 Nov 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.10.008
PMID:23140907
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

A new reimbursement scheme (RS) for glucose lowering therapies (GLT) was implemented in Sweden on March 1, 2010. Products on the market were retained, restricted, excluded or excluded for new courses in the new RS. The aim of this study was to compare utilization and costs of GLT for type 2 diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) before and after the implementation of the changed RS.

METHODS

This was a quasi-experimental study using data on dispensed GLT and costs from a database on dispensed individual based prescriptions in Sweden. Segmented regression analyses were used to assess utilization and costs.

RESULTS

Following the changed reimbursement status, there was an accelerated increasing trend in number of patients treated with restricted (P=0.0007) or retained (P=0.0021) insulins, as well as in costs for insulin based GLT (P=0.0014). No impact was detected in the total number of patients treated with oral GLT, but a slightly negative trend in total costs for oral GLT was detected following the intervention (P=0.0177).

CONCLUSIONS

The new reimbursement scheme had a minor impact on utilization and costs of oral GLT. Despite restricted reimbursement for patients with T2DM, the utilization of insulin based GLT and related costs increased faster following the intervention.

摘要

目的

2010 年 3 月 1 日,瑞典实施了一种新的降糖治疗(GLT)报销方案(RS)。市场上的产品在新 RS 中被保留、限制、排除或排除用于新疗程。本研究旨在比较 RS 变更前后 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)GLT 的使用情况和成本。

方法

这是一项使用瑞典个人处方配药数据库中配药 GLT 和成本数据的准实验研究。采用分段回归分析评估使用情况和成本。

结果

改变报销状况后,接受限制(P=0.0007)或保留(P=0.0021)胰岛素治疗的患者数量以及胰岛素 GLT 治疗的成本呈加速增长趋势(P=0.0014)。接受口服 GLT 治疗的患者总数没有影响,但干预后口服 GLT 的总成本呈略微负向趋势(P=0.0177)。

结论

新的报销方案对口服 GLT 的使用情况和成本影响较小。尽管对 T2DM 患者的胰岛素报销受到限制,但干预后,基于胰岛素的 GLT 的使用和相关成本增长更快。

相似文献

1
Utilization and costs of glucose lowering therapies following health technology assessment for the new reimbursement scheme in Sweden.在瑞典新报销计划的卫生技术评估后,降低血糖治疗的利用和成本。
Health Policy. 2012 Dec;108(2-3):207-15. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.10.008. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
2
Utilization and costs of lipid modifying therapies following health technology assessment for the new reimbursement scheme in Sweden.在瑞典新报销计划的卫生技术评估后,降脂治疗的使用情况和成本。
Health Policy. 2012 Jan;104(1):84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.10.010. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
3
[Costs of antihyperglycemic drugs and consumables and treatment satisfaction in patients with type 2 diabetes. Results of the health care research study LIVE-DE (long-acting insulin glargine compared with NPH insulin in Germany)].[2型糖尿病患者的降糖药物及耗材成本与治疗满意度。医疗保健研究LIVE-DE(德国甘精胰岛素与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素对比)研究结果]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2009 Jun;134(23):1207-13. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1222595. Epub 2009 May 26.
4
Resource utilisation and costs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with insulin glargine or conventional basal insulin under real-world conditions in Germany: LIVE-SPP study.在德国现实条件下,使用甘精胰岛素或传统基础胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者的资源利用和成本:LIVE-SPP研究
J Med Econ. 2008;11(4):695-712. doi: 10.3111/13696990802645726.
5
Health outcomes and economic impact of therapy conversion to a biphasic insulin analog pen among privately insured patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.2型糖尿病私人参保患者转换为双相胰岛素类似物笔治疗的健康结局和经济影响。
Pharmacotherapy. 2007 Jul;27(7):948-62. doi: 10.1592/phco.27.7.948.
6
[BOT with insulin glargine versus BOT with insulin detemir: comparison of treatment costs in type 2 diabetes based on the results of the insulin glargine (Lantus) versus insulin detemir (Levemir) Treat-To-Target (L2T3) study from the German Statutory Health Insurance perspective].甘精胰岛素治疗的基础胰岛素治疗(BOT)与地特胰岛素治疗的基础胰岛素治疗对比:基于德国法定医疗保险视角下甘精胰岛素(来得时)与地特胰岛素(诺和平)达标治疗(L2T3)研究结果的2型糖尿病治疗成本比较
MMW Fortschr Med. 2010 Oct 14;152 Suppl 3:89-95.
7
[The increase in the use of drug treatment for diabetes mellitus in the Netherlands, 1998-2003].[1998 - 2003年荷兰糖尿病药物治疗使用情况的增加]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2006 Jun 24;150(25):1396-401.
8
Health care costs and medication adherence associated with initiation of insulin pen therapy in Medicaid-enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective database analysis.医疗补助计划覆盖的2型糖尿病患者开始胰岛素笔治疗后的医疗费用及药物依从性:一项回顾性数据库分析
Clin Ther. 2007 Jun;29(6 Pt 1):1294-305. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.07.007.
9
Insulin therapy for diabetes mellitus: treatment regimens and associated costs.糖尿病的胰岛素治疗:治疗方案及相关费用。
Diabetes Metab. 2012 Apr;38(2):156-63. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2011.10.003. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
10
Direct healthcare costs of patients with type 2 diabetes using long-acting insulin analogues or NPH insulin in a basal insulin-only regimen.使用长效胰岛素类似物或 NPH 胰岛素的 2 型糖尿病患者在基础胰岛素治疗方案中的直接医疗成本。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2010 Oct;4(3):165-72. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2010.04.004. Epub 2010 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of reimbursement reform of antidiabetic medicines from the patients' perspective - a survey among patients with type 2 diabetes in Finland.从患者角度看糖尿病药物报销改革的效果——芬兰 2 型糖尿病患者的调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 29;19(1):769. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4633-9.
2
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of cap and co-payment on rational use of medicines.药品政策:封顶价和共付额对合理用药的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 8;2015(5):CD007017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007017.pub2.