内镜括约肌切开术与内镜乳头气囊扩张术治疗的长期疗效比较:基于倾向评分的队列分析。
Comparison of long-term outcomes after endoscopic sphincterotomy versus endoscopic papillary balloon dilation: a propensity score-based cohort analysis.
机构信息
First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan.
出版信息
J Gastroenterol. 2013 Sep;48(9):1090-6. doi: 10.1007/s00535-012-0707-8. Epub 2012 Nov 10.
BACKGROUND
Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) is widely performed in patients with common bile duct stones (CBDS). However, the long-term outcomes of patients following ES have not been sufficiently elucidated. Impaired papillary function following ES may result in additional late complications. In contrast, endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD)-another option for treating CBDS-is expected to preserve papillary function. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of patients with CBDS treated with ES to those treated with EPBD in a large cohort. In addition, a subgroup analysis was performed, according to gallbladder (GB) status.
METHODS
A cohort study was performed using propensity score matching to reduce treatment selection bias. This involved the analysis of follow-up data for 1086 patients who underwent EPBD or ES for CBDS.
RESULTS
Propensity score matching extracted 246 pairs of patients. The median (interquartile range) follow-up period after EPBD or ES was 93.5 (46.8-129.2) months and 90 (42-139.3) months, respectively. The incidence of CBDS recurrence after EPBD and ES were 8.5 and 15.0 %, respectively. The hazard ratio (95 % CI) was 0.577 (0.338-0.986) (P = 0.044). Based on the status of the GB, the incidence of CBDS recurrence was significantly different between post-EPBD and post-ES in the group with cholecystectomy after EPBD/ES (P = 0.013).
CONCLUSIONS
The incidence of biliary complications was significantly lower in patients after EPBD than in those after ES, and this outcome appeared most markedly in patients who also underwent cholecystectomy.
背景
内镜下括约肌切开术(ES)广泛应用于胆总管结石(CBDS)患者。然而,ES 后患者的长期预后尚未得到充分阐明。ES 后乳头功能受损可能导致额外的迟发性并发症。相比之下,内镜乳头气囊扩张术(EPBD)——另一种治疗 CBDS 的选择——有望保留乳头功能。本研究旨在比较大样本中 CBDS 患者接受 ES 与 EPBD 治疗的长期疗效。此外,还根据胆囊(GB)状态进行了亚组分析。
方法
采用倾向评分匹配法进行队列研究,以减少治疗选择偏倚。该研究分析了 1086 例接受 EPBD 或 ES 治疗 CBDS 的患者的随访数据。
结果
倾向评分匹配提取了 246 对患者。EPBD 或 ES 后中位(四分位距)随访时间分别为 93.5(46.8-129.2)个月和 90(42-139.3)个月。EPBD 和 ES 后 CBDS 复发率分别为 8.5%和 15.0%。风险比(95%CI)为 0.577(0.338-0.986)(P=0.044)。根据 GB 状态,在 EPBD/ES 后行胆囊切除术的患者中,EPBD 后与 ES 后 CBDS 复发率差异有统计学意义(P=0.013)。
结论
与 ES 后相比,EPBD 后患者发生胆道并发症的风险显著降低,在同时行胆囊切除术的患者中这一结果更为明显。