Department of Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Radiology. 2013 Feb;266(2):555-63. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120399. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
To compare lumbar muscle fat-signal fractions derived from three-dimensional dual gradient-echo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and multiple gradient-echo MR imaging with fractions from single-voxel MR spectroscopy in patients with low back pain.
This prospective study had institutional review board approval, and written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. Fifty-six patients (32 women; mean age, 52 years ± 15 [standard deviation]; age range, 20-79 years) with low back pain underwent standard 1.5-T MR imaging, which was supplemented by dual-echo MR imaging, multi-echo MR imaging, and MR spectroscopy to quantify fatty degeneration of bilateral lumbar multifidus muscles in a region of interest at the intervertebral level of L4 through L5. Fat-signal fractions were determined from signal intensities on fat- and water-only images from both imaging data sets (dual-echo and multi-echo fat-signal fractions without T2* correction) or directly obtained, with additional T2* correction, from multi-echo MR imaging. The results were compared with MR spectroscopic fractions. The Student t test and Bland-Altman plots were used to quantify agreement between fat-signal fractions derived from imaging and from spectroscopy.
In total, 102 spectroscopic measurements were obtained bilaterally (46 of 56) or unilaterally (10 of 56). Mean spectroscopic fat-signal fraction was 19.6 ± 11.4 (range, 5.4-63.5). Correlation between spectroscopic and all imaging-based fat-signal fractions was statistically significant (R(2) = 0.87-0.92; all P < .001). Mean dual-echo fat-signal fractions not corrected for T2* and multi-echo fat-signal fractions corrected for T2* significantly differed from spectroscopic fractions (both P < .01), but mean multi-echo fractions not corrected for T2* did not (P = .11). There was a small measurement bias of 0.5% (95% limits of agreement: -6.0%, 7.2%) compared with spectroscopic fractions.
Large-volume image-based (dual-echo and multi-echo MR imaging) and spectroscopic fat-signal fractions agree well, thus allowing fast and accurate quantification of muscle fat content in patients with low back pain.
比较三维双回波磁共振成像(MR)和多回波 MR 成像衍生的腰椎肌肉脂肪信号分数与来自低腰痛患者单像素磁共振波谱的分数。
本前瞻性研究获得了机构审查委员会的批准,并获得了所有研究参与者的书面知情同意书。56 名患者(32 名女性;平均年龄 52 岁±15[标准差];年龄范围,20-79 岁)患有腰痛,接受了标准的 1.5-T MR 成像检查,该检查通过双回波 MR 成像、多回波 MR 成像以及 MR 波谱补充,以在 L4 至 L5 椎间水平对双侧腰椎多裂肌的感兴趣区域进行定量脂肪变性。从两个成像数据集(双回波和多回波脂肪信号分数,无需 T2校正)的脂肪和水仅图像的信号强度确定脂肪信号分数,或直接从多回波 MR 成像获得,并且具有额外的 T2校正。将结果与磁共振波谱分数进行比较。使用学生 t 检验和 Bland-Altman 图来量化成像衍生的脂肪信号分数与波谱衍生的脂肪信号分数之间的一致性。
总共双侧(56 例中的 46 例)或单侧(56 例中的 10 例)获得了 102 次波谱测量。波谱学测量的平均脂肪信号分数为 19.6±11.4(范围,5.4-63.5)。波谱学和所有基于成像的脂肪信号分数之间的相关性具有统计学意义(R2=0.87-0.92;所有 P<.001)。未校正 T2的双回波脂肪信号分数和校正 T2的多回波脂肪信号分数与波谱学分数明显不同(两者 P<.01),但未校正 T2*的多回波分数则没有(P=0.11)。与波谱学分数相比,存在 0.5%(95%置信区间:-6.0%,7.2%)的小测量偏差。
大容量基于图像(双回波和多回波 MR 成像)和波谱脂肪信号分数具有良好的一致性,因此可以在低腰痛患者中快速准确地定量肌肉脂肪含量。