Cost analysis of open versus robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to report on the costs, operative times, and length of stay for robotic and open sacrocolpopexy.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective study compares consecutive open and robotic sacrocolpopexies that were performed beyond the surgical learning curve. Hospital direct costs, operative times, and length of stay were compared for the 2 groups. Robot cost and maintenance were included. Statistical significance was considered at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

The study comprised 91 open and 73 robotic sacrocolpopexies. Both groups were similar clinically. Median operative times for open and robotic approaches were 166 and 212 minutes (P < 0.001), respectively, and length of stay was 3 versus 2 days (P < 0.001). Of the women in the robotic group, 48% had length of stay less than 24 hours versus 1% in the open group. Median robotic and open procedure direct costs were $6668 and $7804 (P = 0.002), respectively. Readmission rates at 30 days postoperatively were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic sacrocolpopexy costs less but takes slightly longer to perform than the open procedure.