School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Australia.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;47(1):74-87. doi: 10.1177/0004867412466595. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
This study examined longitudinal trends in the dispensing of psychotropic medications in Australia from January 2000 to December 2011.
Dispensing data for the major classes of psychotropic medications (antidepressants, anxiolytics, sedatives, antipsychotics, mood stabilisers and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications) were obtained from the Drug Utilisation Sub-Committee of the Australian Department of Health and Ageing. Results were expressed in terms of defined daily doses/1000 population/day (DDDs/1000/day).
There was a 58.2% increase in the dispensing of psychotropic drugs in Australia from 2000 to 2011, driven by major increases in antidepressants (95.3% increase in DDDs/1000/day), atypical antipsychotics (217.7% increase) and ADHD medications (72.9% increase). Dispensing of anxiolytics remained largely unchanged, while sedatives and typical antipsychotics decreased by 26.4% and 61.2%, respectively. Lithium dispensing remained static while valproate and lamotrigine increased markedly. In 2011, antidepressants accounted for 66.9% of total psychotropic DDDs/1000/day totals, far greater than anxiolytics (11.4%), antipsychotics (7.3%), mood stabilisers (5.8%), sedatives (5.5%), or ADHD medications (3.0%). Sertraline, olanzapine, valproate and methylphenidate were the most frequently dispensed antidepressant, antipsychotic, mood stabiliser and ADHD medication, respectively, while diazepam and temazepam were the most commonly dispensed anxiolytic and sedative.
Psychotropic utilisation markedly increased in Australia between 2000 and 2011. Some potential concerns include: (1) the continuing high use of benzodiazepines, particularly alprazolam, despite their problematic effects; (2) the rapid increase in serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) use, given their more complex side-effect profile relative to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs); and (3) the dramatic increase in antidepressant prescriptions despite questions about the efficacy of these drugs in mild to moderate depression. Finally, some limitations are identified regarding use of the DDDs/1000/day metric, which can distort estimates of utilisation of specific drugs when the defined daily dose is higher or lower than the formulation most commonly dispensed by pharmacies.
本研究旨在考察 2000 年 1 月至 2011 年 12 月期间澳大利亚精神药物配药的纵向趋势。
从澳大利亚卫生部和老龄事务部药物利用小组委员会获取主要精神药物类别(抗抑郁药、抗焦虑药、镇静剂、抗精神病药、情绪稳定剂和注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)药物)的配药数据。结果以每 1000 人/天的定义日剂量(DDD/1000 人/天)表示。
2000 年至 2011 年,澳大利亚精神药物的配药量增长了 58.2%,主要原因是抗抑郁药(DDD/1000 人/天增加了 95.3%)、非典型抗精神病药(增加了 217.7%)和 ADHD 药物(增加了 72.9%)的大量增加。抗焦虑药的配药基本保持不变,而镇静剂和典型抗精神病药则分别减少了 26.4%和 61.2%。锂的配药保持不变,而丙戊酸和拉莫三嗪则显著增加。2011 年,抗抑郁药占精神药物总 DDD/1000 人/天的 66.9%,远远高于抗焦虑药(11.4%)、抗精神病药(7.3%)、情绪稳定剂(5.8%)、镇静剂(5.5%)或 ADHD 药物(3.0%)。舍曲林、奥氮平、丙戊酸和哌甲酯分别是最常开的抗抑郁药、抗精神病药、情绪稳定剂和 ADHD 药物,而地西泮和替马西泮则是最常开的抗焦虑药和镇静剂。
2000 年至 2011 年期间,澳大利亚的精神药物使用明显增加。一些潜在的问题包括:(1)尽管苯二氮䓬类药物(特别是阿普唑仑)存在问题,但仍在大量使用;(2)血清素去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRI)的使用迅速增加,与选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)相比,它们的副作用更为复杂;(3)尽管人们对这些药物在轻度至中度抑郁中的疗效存在疑问,但抗抑郁药的处方却大幅增加。最后,还确定了使用 DDD/1000 人/天指标的一些局限性,当定义日剂量高于或低于药店最常配药的剂型时,该指标可能会扭曲对特定药物使用的估计。