Suppr超能文献

直肠癌手术后腹腔连续灌洗与硬膜外持续输注局麻药的术后镇痛效果比较:一项随机对照多中心研究。

The postoperative analgesic efficacy of preperitoneal continuous wound infusion compared to epidural continuous infusion with local anesthetics after colorectal cancer surgery: a randomized controlled multicenter study.

机构信息

Division of Surgical Oncology, IRCCS San Martino-IST National Institute for Cancer Research, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132 Genova, Italy.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2012 Dec;115(6):1442-50. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31826b4694. Epub 2012 Nov 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Open colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery induces severe and prolonged postoperative pain. The optimal method of postoperative analgesia in CRC surgery has not been established. We evaluated the efficacy of preperitoneal continuous wound infusion (CWI) of ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia after open CRC surgery in a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

Candidates for open CRC surgery randomly received preperitoneal CWI analgesia or continuous epidural infusion (CEI) analgesia with ropivacaine 0.2% 10 mL/h for 48 hours after surgery. Fifty-three patients were allocated to each group. All patients received patient-controlled IV morphine analgesia.

RESULTS

Over the 72-hour period after the end of surgery, CWI analgesia was not inferior to CEI analgesia. The difference of the mean visual analog scale score between CEI and CWI patients was 1.89 (97.5% confidence interval = -0.42, 4.19) at rest and 2.76 (97.5% confidence interval = -2.28, 7.80) after coughing. Secondary end points, morphine consumption and rescue analgesia, did not differ between groups. Time to first flatus was 3.06 ± 0.77 days in the CWI group and 3.61 ± 1.41 days in the CEI group (P = 0.002). Time to first stool was shorter in the CWI than the CEI group (4.49 ± 0.99 vs 5.29 ± 1.62 days; P = 0.001). Mean time to hospital discharge was shorter in the CWI group than in the CEI group (7.4 ± 0.41 and 8.0 ± 0.38 days, respectively). More patients in the CWI group reported excellent quality of postoperative pain control (45.3% vs 7.6%). Quality of night sleep was better with CWI analgesia, particularly at the postoperative 72-hour evaluation (P = 0.009). Postoperative nausea and vomiting was significantly less frequent with CWI analgesia at 24 hours (P = 0.02), 48 hours (P = 0.01), and 72 hours (P = 0.007) after surgery evaluations.

CONCLUSIONS

Preperitoneal CWI analgesia with ropivacaine 0.2% continuous infusion at 10 mL/h during 48 hours after open CRC surgery provided effective postoperative pain relief not inferior to CEI analgesia.

摘要

背景

开放性结直肠癌(CRC)手术会引起严重且持久的术后疼痛。CRC 手术后最佳的术后镇痛方法尚未确定。我们在一项多中心随机对照试验中评估了罗哌卡因腹腔前连续伤口输注(CWI)在开放性 CRC 手术后用于术后镇痛的效果。

方法

接受开放性 CRC 手术的患者随机接受腹腔前 CWI 镇痛或连续硬膜外输注(CEI)镇痛,术后 48 小时内给予罗哌卡因 0.2%,10 mL/h。每组分配 53 名患者。所有患者均接受患者自控静脉注射吗啡镇痛。

结果

在手术结束后 72 小时内,CWI 镇痛并不逊于 CEI 镇痛。CEI 组和 CWI 组患者在休息时的平均视觉模拟评分差值为 1.89(97.5%置信区间=-0.42,4.19),咳嗽时的差值为 2.76(97.5%置信区间=-2.28,7.80)。次要终点,吗啡消耗量和补救性镇痛,两组间无差异。CWI 组首次排气时间为 3.06±0.77 天,CEI 组为 3.61±1.41 天(P=0.002)。CWI 组首次排便时间短于 CEI 组(4.49±0.99 与 5.29±1.62 天;P=0.001)。CWI 组的平均住院时间短于 CEI 组(分别为 7.4±0.41 天和 8.0±0.38 天)。CWI 组有更多患者报告术后疼痛控制的质量优异(45.3%比 7.6%)。CWI 镇痛时夜间睡眠质量更好,特别是在术后 72 小时评估时(P=0.009)。术后 24 小时(P=0.02)、48 小时(P=0.01)和 72 小时(P=0.007)时,CWI 镇痛术后恶心呕吐的发生率明显较低。

结论

在开放性 CRC 手术后,罗哌卡因 0.2%连续输注 10 mL/h,连续输注 48 小时,腹腔前 CWI 镇痛提供了有效的术后镇痛,效果不逊于 CEI 镇痛。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验