Department of Psychiatry and CIBERSAM, University of Oviedo, 33006, Oviedo, Spain.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Feb;77(2):272-84. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12031.
The aim of this review was to update and summarize the scientific knowledge on the long term outcomes of the different pharmacological treatment options for opioid dependence currently available and to provide a critical discussion on the different treatment options based on these results. We performed a literature search using the PubMed databases and the reference lists of the identified articles. Data from research show that the three pharmacological options reviewed are effective treatments for opioid dependence with positive long term outcomes. However, each one has its specific target population and setting. While methadone and buprenorphine are first line options, heroin-assisted treatment is a second line option for those patients refractory to treatment with methadone with concomitant severe physical, mental, social and/or functional problems. Buprenorphine seems to be the best option for use in primary care offices. The field of opioid dependence treatment is poised to undergo a process of reinforcement and transformation. Further efforts from researchers, clinicians and authorities should be made to turn new pharmacological options into clinical reality and to overcome the structural and functional obstacles that maintenance programmes face in combatting opioid dependence.
本综述的目的是更新和总结目前可用的治疗阿片类药物依赖的不同药物治疗选择的长期结果的科学知识,并根据这些结果对不同的治疗选择进行批判性讨论。我们使用 PubMed 数据库和已确定文章的参考文献列表进行了文献检索。研究数据表明,所审查的三种药理学选择都是阿片类药物依赖的有效治疗方法,具有积极的长期结果。然而,每种方法都有其特定的目标人群和环境。虽然美沙酮和丁丙诺啡是一线治疗选择,但对于那些对美沙酮治疗有抗药性且同时存在严重身体、心理、社会和/或功能问题的患者,海洛因辅助治疗是二线治疗选择。丁丙诺啡似乎是在初级保健办公室使用的最佳选择。阿片类药物依赖治疗领域正准备经历强化和转型的过程。研究人员、临床医生和当局应进一步努力,将新的药物选择转化为临床现实,并克服维持方案在治疗阿片类药物依赖方面面临的结构和功能障碍。