Suppr超能文献

评估国际医学毕业生在 MRCOG 第 1 部分和第 2 部分笔试中的首次表现。

An evaluation of the first time performance of international medical graduates in the MRCOG Part 1 and Part 2 written examinations.

机构信息

Women and Children's Hospital, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull HU3 2JZ, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Feb;166(2):124-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.10.004. Epub 2012 Nov 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the performance of international medical graduates in the MRCOG Part 1 and Part 2 written examinations.

STUDY DESIGN

Using the database of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, a retrospective analysis was performed of the performance of overseas candidates who appeared for the first time in the Part 1 (n=11,863) and Part 2 written (n=5336) MRCOG examinations between 2000 and 2010. Candidates were grouped according to the RCOG geographical bands.

RESULTS

In the Part 1 MRCOG examination the graduates of band E (India and Pakistan) and band B (Australia, New Zealand and Canada) performed well (pass rate 41.2% and 39.3% respectively) but the candidates of band C (East Africa 27.1%) and bands J and A (Europe 29.9%, Ireland 17.9%) underperformed. In the MRCOG Part 2 written examination the medical graduates of band D (Singapore and Hong Kong) and band B (Australia, New Zealand and Canada) performed well (pass rates 65.9% and 54.8%), but the candidates of band H (Middle East, pass rate 8.5%) and band C (Africa West, pass rate 12.7%) performed worse than the remaining cohort. The greatest number of candidates in the Part 2 written examinations appeared from India and Pakistan (n=2999, pass rate 22.2%).

CONCLUSION

Our results have shown that there is variation in performance among the IMG from different geographical regions in the Part 1 and Part 2 written MRCOG examinations.

摘要

目的

评估国际医学毕业生在 MRCOG 第 1 部分和第 2 部分笔试中的表现。

研究设计

利用皇家妇产科医师学院的数据库,对 2000 年至 2010 年间首次参加第 1 部分(n=11863)和第 2 部分(n=5336)MRCOG 笔试的海外考生的表现进行了回顾性分析。考生根据 RCOG 地理带分组。

结果

在第 1 部分 MRCOG 考试中,E 带(印度和巴基斯坦)和 B 带(澳大利亚、新西兰和加拿大)的毕业生表现良好(通过率分别为 41.2%和 39.3%),但 C 带(东非 27.1%)和 J 带和 A 带(欧洲 29.9%,爱尔兰 17.9%)的考生表现不佳。在第 2 部分 MRCOG 笔试中,D 带(新加坡和中国香港)和 B 带(澳大利亚、新西兰和加拿大)的医学毕业生表现良好(通过率分别为 65.9%和 54.8%),但 H 带(中东,通过率 8.5%)和 C 带(非洲西部,通过率 12.7%)的考生表现不如其他考生。第 2 部分笔试中考生人数最多的是来自印度和巴基斯坦的考生(n=2999,通过率 22.2%)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,在第 1 部分和第 2 部分的 MRCOG 笔试中,来自不同地理区域的 IMG 考生的表现存在差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验