Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 85, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Jan;45(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.10.011. Epub 2012 Nov 11.
The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyse early and late results of surgical management of internal carotid artery (ICA) true and false aneurysms in a single-centre experience.
From January 1988 to December 2011, 50 consecutive interventions for ICA aneurismal disease were performed; interventions were performed for true ICA aneurysm in 19 cases (group 1) and for ICA post-carotid endarterectomy (CEA) pseudo-aneurysm in the remaining 31 (group 2). Early results (<30 days) were evaluated in terms of mortality, stroke and cranial nerves' injury and compared between the two groups with χ(2) test. Follow-up results (stroke free-survival, freedom from ICA thrombosis and reintervention) were analysed with Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with log-rank test.
All the patients in group 1 had open repair of their ICA aneurysm; in group 2 open repair was performed in 30 cases, while three patients with post-CEA aneurysm without signs of infection had a covered stent placed. There were no perioperative deaths. Two major strokes occurred in group 1 and one major stroke occurred in group 2 (p = 0.1). The rates of postoperative cranial nerve injuries were 10.5% in group 1 and 13% in group 2 (p = 0.8). Median duration of follow-up was 60 months (range 1-276). Estimated 10-year stroke-free survival rates were 64% in group 1 and 37% in group 2 (p = 0.4, log rank 0.5); thrombosis-free survival at 10 years was 66% in group 1 and 34% in group 2 (p = 0.2, log rank 1.2), while the corresponding figures in terms of reintervention-free survival were 68% and 33%, respectively (p = 0.2, log rank 1.8).
Surgical treatment of ICA aneurismal disease provided in our experience satisfactory early and long-term results, without significant differences between true and false aneurysms. In carefully selected patients with non-infected false aneurysm, the endovascular option seems to be feasible.
本研究旨在回顾性分析单中心经验中手术治疗颈内动脉(ICA)真性和假性动脉瘤的早期和晚期结果。
1988 年 1 月至 2011 年 12 月,对 50 例 ICA 瘤样病变进行了连续干预;19 例(第 1 组)行 ICA 真性动脉瘤手术,31 例(第 2 组)行颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后假性动脉瘤手术。通过 χ(2)检验比较两组的早期(<30 天)死亡率、卒中和颅神经损伤结果。采用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线分析随访结果(无卒中生存率、无 ICA 血栓形成和再干预率),并采用对数秩检验进行比较。
第 1 组所有患者均行 ICA 动脉瘤开放性修复;第 2 组 30 例患者行开放性修复,3 例 CEA 后无感染征象的动脉瘤患者行覆膜支架置入术。两组均无围手术期死亡。第 1 组发生 2 例重大卒中,第 2 组发生 1 例重大卒中(p = 0.1)。第 1 组术后颅神经损伤发生率为 10.5%,第 2 组为 13%(p = 0.8)。中位随访时间为 60 个月(1-276 个月)。第 1 组 10 年无卒中生存率为 64%,第 2 组为 37%(p = 0.4,对数秩检验 0.5);第 1 组 10 年无血栓生存率为 66%,第 2 组为 34%(p = 0.2,对数秩检验 1.2),而无再干预生存率的相应数字分别为 68%和 33%(p = 0.2,对数秩检验 1.8)。
我们的经验表明,手术治疗 ICA 瘤样病变的早期和长期结果令人满意,真性和假性动脉瘤之间无显著差异。在精心选择的非感染性假性动脉瘤患者中,血管内治疗似乎是可行的。