Universidad de La Laguna, Spain.
Span J Psychol. 2012 Nov;15(3):1099-109. doi: 10.5209/rev_sjop.2012.v15.n3.39400.
Infrahumanization research has verified that in intergroup contexts, there is a strong tendency to attribute secondary emotions, which are uniquely human, to the ingroup, while limiting that attribution in outgroups. Experiments have shown it to be as common as ingroup bias. However, it is not yet known what characteristics may mitigate this trend. This paper presents two studies. The first analyzes the impact of helping behavior on attributions of human traits to two fictitious groups. The second study's objective was to determine if members of the Spanish ingroup would infrahumanize an Ethiopian outgroup less when that outgroup performs prosocial behavior towards another group. Infrahumanization was determined by a lexical decision task, using the names of ingroup and outgroup members as priming. The results demonstrate that describing a fictitious group in altruistic terms increases their human profile (experiment one) and reduces infrahumanization (experiment two).
去人性化研究已经证实,在群体间情境中,人们有一种强烈的倾向,即将次人类情感归因于内群体,而对内群体进行限制。实验表明,这种趋势与内群体偏见一样普遍。然而,目前还不清楚哪些特征可能减轻这种趋势。本文提出了两项研究。第一项分析了帮助行为对两个虚构群体的人类特征归因的影响。第二项研究的目的是确定当一个埃塞俄比亚的外群体对另一个群体表现出亲社会行为时,西班牙内群体是否会较少地将其去人性化。去人性化是通过词汇决策任务来确定的,使用内群体和外群体成员的名字作为启动。结果表明,用利他的术语描述一个虚构的群体可以增加他们的人类特征(实验一)并减少去人性化(实验二)。