Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 27;13(11):e0207343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207343. eCollection 2018.
Dehumanization and infrahumanization involve decreasing the humanity attributed to others. Despite the existence of a large body of work on these topics, little is known about how to increase outgroup humanization. Across two experiments, we examined the effects of intergroup and intragroup helping on dehumanization and infrahumanization. In Study 1, we showed that news of an outgroup helping the ingroup after a natural disaster reduced infrahumanization, but not dehumanization. Reduced infrahumanization emerged regardless of the amount of aid given by the outgroup. By contrast, learning about ingroup helping the outgroup following a natural disaster did not decrease dehumanization or infrahumanization, regardless of amount of aid offered by the ingroup. Study 2 replicated and extended these findings by demonstrating that only intergroup helping by the outgroup to the ingroup reduced dehumanization. Intragroup helping, by either the ingroup or outgroup had no influence on outgroup perceptions. We report all measures, manipulations, and exclusions in each study. Implications of recent research on intergroup helping as a means to outgroup humanization are considered.
去人性化和次人类化涉及减少对他人的人性归因。尽管有大量关于这些主题的研究,但对于如何增加外群体的人性化知之甚少。在两项实验中,我们考察了群体间和群体内帮助对去人性化和次人类化的影响。在研究 1 中,我们表明,自然灾害后外群体帮助内群体的消息减少了次人类化,但没有减少去人性化。无论外群体提供的援助数量多少,减少次人类化的现象都会出现。相比之下,自然灾害后了解到内群体帮助外群体,无论内群体提供的援助数量多少,都不会减少去人性化或次人类化。研究 2 通过证明只有外群体对内群体的群体间帮助才能减少去人性化,复制并扩展了这些发现。无论是内群体还是外群体的群体内帮助,对外群体的看法都没有影响。我们在每项研究中报告了所有的测量、操作和排除。考虑了最近关于群体间帮助作为一种实现外群体人性化手段的研究的启示。