• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于氯吡格雷联合华法林与单用氯吡格雷预防股腘动脉血管成形术后再狭窄的前瞻性随机对照临床试验

[A prospective randomized control clinical trial about clopidogrel combined with warfarin versus clopidogrel alone in the prevention of restenosis after femoral-popliteal artery angioplasty].

作者信息

Liang Gang-zhu, Zhang Fu-xian, Luo Xiao-yun, Zhang Chang-ming, Hu Lu, Feng Ya-ping, Niu Lu-yuan, Zhang Huan, Ma Bing-bing, Qi Hao-shan, Guo Mei-mei, Long Yan-Yu, Li Hai-Lei

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Shijitan Hospital, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Aug;50(8):704-8.

PMID:23157902
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Using two antithrombotic treatment (clopidogrel vs. clopidogrel combined warfarin) strategies after femoral-popliteal artery angioplasty prospectively, to evaluate which strategy is more effective for the restenosis prevention.

METHODS

Totally 50 patients referred for endovascular treatment (including the percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stent implantation) of the superficial femoral artery and popliteal artery from January 2008 to May 2009 were randomly divided into clopidogrel group (group A, 25 cases, 30 limbs) and clopidogrel plus warfarin group (group B, 25 cases, 33 limbs) before operation. Clinical outcomes and restenosis rate of the target lesions were evaluated at 3, 6 and 12 months after operation.

RESULTS

Totally 88 patients were screened for participation in the study, 56 patients were included after the follow-up of 12 months. At 3 months, the rates of restenosis were 16.7% in group A and 18.2% in group B (χ² = 0.025, P = 0.874). At 6 months, the accumulated restenosis rates were 36.7% in group A and 36.4% in group B (χ² = 0.001, P = 0.98). At 12 months, the accumulated restenosis rates were 53.3% in group A and 42.4% in group B (χ² = 0.75, P = 0.387). Analysis for the critical limb ischemia sub-group showed that follow-up of 12 months, the accumulated restenosis rate was 8/10 in group A and 6/12 in group B (χ² = 1.023, P = 0.312).

CONCLUSION

The clopidogrel alone treatment for PTA or PTA plus stent implantation of femoral popliteal artery has no statistically significant difference in comparison with the clopidogrel combined warfarin treatment in terms of the cumulative vascular restenosis rate at 3, 6, 12 months postoperatively.

摘要

目的

前瞻性地采用两种抗栓治疗策略(氯吡格雷对比氯吡格雷联合华法林)用于股腘动脉血管成形术后,评估哪种策略在预防再狭窄方面更有效。

方法

2008年1月至2009年5月期间,共50例因股浅动脉和腘动脉接受血管内治疗(包括经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)和支架植入)的患者在术前被随机分为氯吡格雷组(A组,25例,30条肢体)和氯吡格雷加华法林组(B组,25例,33条肢体)。在术后3、6和12个月评估目标病变的临床结局和再狭窄率。

结果

共88例患者被筛选参与本研究,12个月随访后纳入56例患者。3个月时,A组再狭窄率为16.7%,B组为18.2%(χ² = 0.025,P = 0.874)。6个月时,A组累积再狭窄率为36.7%,B组为36.4%(χ² = 0.001,P = 0.98)。12个月时,A组累积再狭窄率为53.3%,B组为42.4%(χ² = 0.75,P = 0.387)。对严重肢体缺血亚组的分析显示,随访12个月时,A组累积再狭窄率为8/10,B组为6/12(χ² = 1.023,P = 0.312)。

结论

在术后3、6、12个月时,单纯氯吡格雷治疗用于股腘动脉PTA或PTA加支架植入与氯吡格雷联合华法林治疗相比,在累积血管再狭窄率方面无统计学显著差异。

相似文献

1
[A prospective randomized control clinical trial about clopidogrel combined with warfarin versus clopidogrel alone in the prevention of restenosis after femoral-popliteal artery angioplasty].一项关于氯吡格雷联合华法林与单用氯吡格雷预防股腘动脉血管成形术后再狭窄的前瞻性随机对照临床试验
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Aug;50(8):704-8.
2
A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial on clopidogrel combined with warfarin versus clopidogrel alone in the prevention of restenosis after endovascular treatment of the femoropopliteal artery.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2013 Jul;27(5):627-33. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2012.07.011. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
3
[Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty versus stent implantation for treatment of femoral and popliteal artery lesion resulted from arteriosclerosis obliterans].经皮腔内血管成形术与支架植入术治疗动脉硬化闭塞症所致股腘动脉病变的对比研究
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2016 Feb 18;48(1):160-5.
4
Intraarterial (192)Ir high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prophylaxis of restenosis after femoropopliteal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty: the prospective randomized Vienna-2-trial radiotherapy parameters and risk factors analysis.动脉内(192)铱高剂量率近距离放射治疗预防股腘动脉经皮腔内血管成形术后再狭窄:前瞻性随机维也纳-2试验放疗参数及危险因素分析
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Nov 1;48(4):923-31. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00716-1.
5
Randomized comparison of ePTFE/nitinol self-expanding stent graft vs prosthetic femoral-popliteal bypass in the treatment of superficial femoral artery occlusive disease.ePTFE/镍钛诺自膨式覆膜支架与人工股腘动脉旁路移植术治疗股浅动脉闭塞性疾病的随机对照研究
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Jan;49(1):109-15, 116.e1-9; discussion 116. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.08.041. Epub 2008 Nov 22.
6
Clopidogrel plus long-term aspirin after femoro-popliteal stenting. The CLAFS project: 1- and 2-year results.
Eur Radiol. 2004 Feb;14(2):302-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-2003-8. Epub 2003 Jul 10.
7
Four-year randomized prospective comparison of percutaneous ePTFE/nitinol self-expanding stent graft versus prosthetic femoral-popliteal bypass in the treatment of superficial femoral artery occlusive disease.经皮 ePTFE/镍钛诺自膨式支架移植物与人工股腘旁路术治疗股浅动脉闭塞性疾病的 4 年随机前瞻性比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Sep;52(3):584-90; discussion 590-1, 591.e1-591.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.03.071.
8
Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon Versus Standard Balloon Angioplasty in In-Stent Restenosis of the Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Artery: 1-Year Results of the PACUBA Trial.紫杉醇洗脱球囊与标准球囊血管成形术治疗股浅动脉和腘动脉支架内再狭窄:PACUBA 试验 1 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jul 11;9(13):1386-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.012.
9
[Outcome of endovascular therapy of iliac, superficial femoral and popliteal arteries in 136 patients].[136例髂动脉、股浅动脉和腘动脉血管内治疗的结果]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2007 Nov;35(11):1015-9.
10
Comparison of Endovascular Versus Bypass Surgery in Femoropopliteal TASC II D Lesions: A Single-Center Study.股腘动脉TASC II D型病变的血管内治疗与旁路手术比较:一项单中心研究
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Feb;47:179-187. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban Compared with Other Therapies Used in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease Undergoing Peripheral Revascularization: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis.利伐沙班与外周动脉疾病患者行外周血运重建术后其他治疗方法的疗效和安全性比较:系统文献回顾和网络荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2021 Aug 24;2021:8561350. doi: 10.1155/2021/8561350. eCollection 2021.