Bongers H, Lenz M, Klier R
Radiologische Klinik der Universität Tübingen.
Strahlenther Onkol. 1990 Feb;166(2):125-31.
A comparison was made between the pretherapeutic CT and ultrasound findings of 43 patients with tumors of the oral tongue and the floor of the mouth. Two tumors of the edge of the tongue (T1) each were not diagnosed by computed tomography and by sonography. In three cases a more precise determination of the tumor size was achieved by sonography. In 25 out of 38 cases the contrast between tumor and sound tissue was better in the sonographic image. The reduction and regressive modification of the tumor following to radiotherapy could be observed in eleven cases. Despite the benefits of sonographic investigation in this area due to the excellent contrast without any need of contrast media, the good availability and the absence of metal and movement artefacts, this method is not able to replace computed tomography. The most important disadvantages of sonography were found to be the incapability to show osseous erosions and the restricted or lacking possibility to assess the parapharyngeal and the retropharyngeal area.
对43例舌癌和口底癌患者治疗前的CT和超声检查结果进行了比较。有2例舌边缘肿瘤(T1)CT和超声均未诊断出来。3例中超声能更精确地测定肿瘤大小。38例中有25例肿瘤与正常组织在超声图像中的对比度更好。11例中观察到放疗后肿瘤缩小及退行性改变。尽管超声检查在该领域有诸多优势,如无需造影剂就能获得极佳的对比度、设备易得且无金属伪影和运动伪影,但该方法无法替代CT。超声检查最重要的缺点是无法显示骨质侵蚀,且评估咽旁和咽后区域的可能性有限或无法评估。