Suppr超能文献

使用卡尔弗特公式以及考克罗夫特和高尔特方程估算肾小球滤过率来评估非小细胞肺癌患者的卡铂给药剂量。

Evaluation of carboplatin dosing in non-small cell lung carcinoma patients using Calvert formula and Cockroft and Gault equation for glomerular filtration rate estimation.

作者信息

Bar-Sela Gil, Kaidar-Person Orit, Mari Fadi, Assady Suheir, Haim Nissim

机构信息

Division of Oncology;

出版信息

Oncol Lett. 2012 Nov;4(5):1072-1076. doi: 10.3892/ol.2012.869. Epub 2012 Aug 20.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the Cockroft and Gault (CG) equation for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation in carboplatin dosing based on the Calvert formula. The records of 117 patients with advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma treated with carboplatin were retrospectively analyzed. Theoretical carboplatin doses derived from the Calvert formula using the CG equation were calculated for each chemotherapy cycle. Fluctuations in the theoretical carboplatin doses were analyzed, and discrepancies between actual carboplatin doses prescribed by the physician and theoretical doses were assessed. It was found that, compared with the first-cycle dose, subsequent theoretical doses were more than 10% higher in 79/320 cycles (24.7%) and more than 10% lower in 53/320 cycles (16.6%; P=0.015). A body mass index greater than or equal to 30 was associated with a tendency for increased CG-estimated GFR during subsequent chemotherapy cycles (P=0.009). Physicians tended to lower the prescribed dose (32.2% of the cycles) by using a higher serum creatinine (Scr) level for dose calculation than was actually measured. We concluded that Calvert formula-derived carboplatin doses fluctuate widely during repeated cycles when actual Scr is used for CG-estimated GFR. The measurement of 24-h creatinine clearance is advised as an alternative in selected patients with reduction in serum creatinine observed during treatments.

摘要

本研究的目的是基于卡尔弗特公式,评估 Cockroft 和 Gault(CG)方程在卡铂给药中估算肾小球滤过率(GFR)的可靠性。对 117 例接受卡铂治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的记录进行回顾性分析。针对每个化疗周期,计算使用 CG 方程从卡尔弗特公式得出的理论卡铂剂量。分析理论卡铂剂量的波动情况,并评估医生开具的实际卡铂剂量与理论剂量之间的差异。结果发现,与第一周期剂量相比,在 79/320 个周期(24.7%)中后续理论剂量高出 10%以上,在 53/320 个周期(16.6%;P = 0.015)中低于 10%。体重指数大于或等于 30 与后续化疗周期中 CG 估算的 GFR 升高趋势相关(P = 0.009)。医生倾向于通过使用高于实际测量值的血清肌酐(Scr)水平进行剂量计算来降低规定剂量(32.2%的周期)。我们得出结论,当将实际 Scr 用于 CG 估算的 GFR 时,卡尔弗特公式得出的卡铂剂量在重复周期中波动很大。对于在治疗期间观察到血清肌酐降低的部分患者,建议测量 24 小时肌酐清除率作为替代方法。

相似文献

3
Measured versus estimated glomerular filtration rate in the Calvert equation: influence on carboplatin dosing.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2001 May;47(5):373-9. doi: 10.1007/s002800000260.
4
Difference of carboplatin clearance estimated by the Cockroft-Gault, Jelliffe, Modified-Jelliffe, Wright or Chatelut formula.
Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Nov;99(2):327-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.06.003. Epub 2005 Jul 11.
5
Performance of formulae based estimates of glomerular filtration rate for carboplatin dosing in stage 1 seminoma.
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Mar;50(5):944-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.12.021. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
9
Formulae recently proposed to estimate renal glomerular filtration rate improve the prediction of carboplatin clearance.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2020 Mar;85(3):585-592. doi: 10.1007/s00280-019-04020-z. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
10
Flat dosing of carboplatin is justified in adult patients with normal renal function.
Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Nov 1;12(21):6502-8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1076.

本文引用的文献

2
Estimation of kidney function in cancer patients.
Dan Med Bull. 2011 Feb;58(2):A4236.
3
Lung cancer and renal insufficiency: prevalence and anticancer drug issues.
Lung. 2009 Jan-Feb;187(1):69-74. doi: 10.1007/s00408-008-9123-5. Epub 2008 Oct 22.
10
Early clinical studies with cis-diammine-1,1-cyclobutane dicarboxylate platinum II.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1982;9(3):140-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00257742.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验