Suppr超能文献

文化适应/涵化与心理健康的元分析。

A meta-analysis of acculturation/enculturation and mental health.

机构信息

Counseling Psychology Program, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

出版信息

J Couns Psychol. 2013 Jan;60(1):15-30. doi: 10.1037/a0030652. Epub 2012 Nov 19.

Abstract

This meta-analytic study examined the relationship among the constructs of acculturation, enculturation, and acculturation strategies (i.e., integration, assimilation, separation, marginalization), and mental health. Data from 325 studies (163 journal articles and 162 dissertation studies) were analyzed using a random-effects model, across a broad spectrum of negative mental health (NM: depression, anxiety, psychological distress, and negative affect) and positive mental health (PM: self-esteem, satisfaction with life, and positive affect). Overall, acculturation was favorably associated with both NM (negatively) and PM (positively), whereas enculturation was favorably related only to PM (positively). In fact, enculturation was positively related to anxiety. The specifics of these relations were further examined using the following moderators: (a) researchers' operationalization of acculturation/enculturation (i.e., linearity, dimensionality); (b) contextual influences (i.e., when and where the study was conducted); and (c) sample characteristics (i.e., voluntariness of residency, race, gender, age). Overall, bilinear measures of acculturation indicated a positive association with PM, while unilinear measures did not. External acculturation (e.g., language, behaviors) and internal enculturation (e.g., identity) were most favorably related to mental health. The place of study had differential effects on the relation of enculturation and NM. Acculturation appeared to be especially important to Asian Americans, whereas enculturation was to African Americans. Differential effects of age suggested the need to consider life-span development of needs and social roles in relation to acculturation and enculturation. Both correlational analyses and mean comparisons affirmed that integration was the most favorable acculturation strategy to mental health. Implications for research, practice, and theory are discussed.

摘要

本元分析研究考察了文化适应、涵化和文化适应策略(即整合、同化、分离、边缘化)之间的关系以及心理健康。使用随机效应模型对 325 项研究(163 篇期刊文章和 162 篇论文研究)的数据进行了分析,研究涵盖了广泛的消极心理健康(NM:抑郁、焦虑、心理困扰和消极情绪)和积极心理健康(PM:自尊、生活满意度和积极情绪)。总体而言,文化适应与 NM(负向)和 PM(正向)都呈正向相关,而涵化仅与 PM(正向)呈正向相关。事实上,涵化与焦虑呈正相关。通过以下调节因素进一步研究了这些关系的细节:(a)研究人员对文化适应/涵化的操作化(即线性、维度);(b)背景影响(即研究的时间和地点);(c)样本特征(即居住的自愿性、种族、性别、年龄)。总体而言,文化适应的双线性度量与 PM 呈正相关,而线性度量则没有。外部文化适应(例如语言、行为)和内部涵化(例如身份)与心理健康最相关。研究地点对涵化与 NM 关系的影响存在差异。文化适应对亚裔美国人尤为重要,而涵化则对非裔美国人重要。年龄的差异效应表明,需要考虑与文化适应和涵化相关的需求和社会角色的生命周期发展。相关分析和均值比较都证实,整合是最有利于心理健康的文化适应策略。讨论了对研究、实践和理论的启示。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验