Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 400736 Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA.
Risk Anal. 2012 Nov;32(11):1834-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01930.x.
Natural and human-induced disasters affect organizations in myriad ways because of the inherent interconnectedness and interdependencies among human, cyber, and physical infrastructures, but more importantly, because organizations depend on the effectiveness of people and on the leadership they provide to the organizations they serve and represent. These human-organizational-cyber-physical infrastructure entities are termed systems of systems. Given the multiple perspectives that characterize them, they cannot be modeled effectively with a single model. The focus of this article is: (i) the centrality of the states of a system in modeling; (ii) the efficacious role of shared states in modeling systems of systems, in identification, and in the meta-modeling of systems of systems; and (iii) the contributions of the above to strategic preparedness, response to, and recovery from catastrophic risk to such systems. Strategic preparedness connotes a decision-making process and its associated actions. These must be: implemented in advance of a natural or human-induced disaster, aimed at reducing consequences (e.g., recovery time, community suffering, and cost), and/or controlling their likelihood to a level considered acceptable (through the decisionmakers' implicit and explicit acceptance of various risks and tradeoffs). The inoperability input-output model (IIM), which is grounded on Leontief's input/output model, has enabled the modeling of interdependent subsystems. Two separate modeling structures are introduced. These are: phantom system models (PSM), where shared states constitute the essence of modeling coupled systems; and the IIM, where interdependencies among sectors of the economy are manifested by the Leontief matrix of technological coefficients. This article demonstrates the potential contributions of these two models to each other, and thus to more informative modeling of systems of systems schema. The contributions of shared states to this modeling and to systems identification are presented with case studies.
自然和人为灾害以无数种方式影响着组织,因为人类、网络和物理基础设施之间存在固有的相互联系和相互依存关系,但更重要的是,因为组织依赖于人员的效力以及他们为所服务和代表的组织提供的领导力。这些人与组织-网络-物理基础设施实体被称为系统的系统。鉴于它们的多个特点,它们不能用单一模型进行有效建模。本文的重点是:(i)系统状态在建模中的中心地位;(ii)共享状态在建模系统的系统、识别和系统的元建模中的有效作用;以及(iii)上述各项对这些系统灾难性风险的战略准备、应对和恢复的贡献。战略准备意味着一个决策过程及其相关行动。这些必须在自然或人为灾害之前实施,旨在减少后果(例如,恢复时间、社区痛苦和成本),和/或将其可能性控制在被认为可接受的水平(通过决策者对各种风险和权衡的隐含和明确接受)。基于 Leontief 投入产出模型的不可操作性投入产出模型(IIM)已经实现了对相互依存子系统的建模。引入了两种单独的建模结构。这些是:幻影系统模型(PSM),其中共享状态构成建模耦合系统的本质;以及 IIM,其中经济部门之间的相互依存关系通过 Leontief 技术系数矩阵表现出来。本文展示了这两个模型彼此之间的潜在贡献,从而更有助于系统的系统模式的信息丰富建模。共享状态对这种建模和系统识别的贡献通过案例研究呈现。