Suppr超能文献

123I-间碘苄胍闪烁扫描术及123I-碘氟烷单光子发射计算机断层扫描术在路易体病中的应用:互补技术还是替代技术?

Iodine-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy and iodine-123 ioflupane single photon emission computed tomography in Lewy body diseases: complementary or alternative techniques?

作者信息

Treglia Giorgio, Cason Ernesto, Cortelli Pietro, Gabellini Anna, Liguori Rocco, Bagnato Antonio, Giordano Alessandro, Fagioli Giorgio

机构信息

Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Neuroimaging. 2014 Mar-Apr;24(2):149-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2012.00774.x. Epub 2012 Nov 19.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare myocardial sympathetic imaging using (123)I-Metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy and striatal dopaminergic imaging using (123)I-Ioflupane (FP-CIT) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in patients with suspected Lewy body diseases (LBD).

METHODS

Ninety-nine patients who performed both methods within 2 months for differential diagnosis between Parkinson's disease (PD) and other parkinsonism (n = 68) or between dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and other dementia (n = 31) were enrolled. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values of both methods were calculated.

RESULTS

For (123) I-MIBG scintigraphy, the overall sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values in LBD were 83%, 79%, 82%, 86%, and 76%, respectively. For (123)I-FP-CIT SPECT, the overall sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values in LBD were 93%, 41%, 73%, 71%, and 80%, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between these two methods in patients without LBD, but not in patients with LBD.

CONCLUSIONS

LBD usually present both myocardial sympathetic and striatal dopaminergic impairments. (123)I-FP-CIT SPECT presents high sensitivity in the diagnosis of LBD; (123)I-MIBG scintigraphy may have a complementary role in differential diagnosis between PD and other parkinsonism. These scintigraphic methods showed similar diagnostic accuracy in differential diagnosis between DLB and other dementia.

摘要

目的

比较使用(123)I-间碘苄胍(MIBG)闪烁扫描术进行心肌交感神经成像和使用(123)I-碘氟潘(FP-CIT)单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)进行纹状体多巴胺能成像在疑似路易体病(LBD)患者中的应用。

方法

纳入99例在2个月内同时进行这两种检查方法以鉴别帕金森病(PD)与其他帕金森综合征(n = 68)或路易体痴呆(DLB)与其他痴呆(n = 31)的患者。计算两种检查方法的敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。

结果

对于(123)I-MIBG闪烁扫描术,LBD患者的总体敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为83%、79%、82%、86%和76%。对于(123)I-FP-CIT SPECT,LBD患者的总体敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为93%、41%、73%、71%和80%。这两种检查方法在非LBD患者中有统计学显著差异,但在LBD患者中无差异。

结论

LBD通常同时存在心肌交感神经和纹状体多巴胺能损害。(123)I-FP-CIT SPECT在LBD诊断中具有高敏感性;(123)I-MIBG闪烁扫描术在PD与其他帕金森综合征的鉴别诊断中可能具有互补作用。这些闪烁扫描方法在DLB与其他痴呆的鉴别诊断中显示出相似的诊断准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验