• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Clinical presentation and predictors of target vessel revascularization after drug-eluting stent implantation.药物洗脱支架植入术后靶血管血运重建的临床表现及预测因素
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2012 Nov-Dec;13(6):311-5. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2012.10.003.
2
Long-term clinical outcome of rotational atherectomy followed by drug-eluting stent implantation in complex calcified coronary lesions.旋磨术联合药物洗脱支架置入术治疗复杂钙化病变的长期临床疗效。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb;81(2):285-91. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24367. Epub 2012 May 2.
3
Comparison of 12-month angiographic outcomes between repeat drug-eluting stent implantation and drug-coated balloon treatment for restenotic lesion caused by stent fracture.重复药物洗脱支架植入术与药物涂层球囊治疗支架断裂所致再狭窄病变的12个月血管造影结果比较
Heart Vessels. 2019 Oct;34(10):1589-1594. doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01398-x. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
4
Predictors and impact of target vessel revascularization after stent implantation for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: lessons from HORIZONS-AMI.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死支架植入术后靶血管血运重建的预测因素及影响:来自HORIZONS-AMI研究的经验教训
Am Heart J. 2015 Feb;169(2):242-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.11.005. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
5
Incidence of definite stent thrombosis or in-stent restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation for treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: from Western Denmark Heart Registry.药物洗脱支架置入治疗冠状动脉支架内再狭窄后明确的支架血栓形成或支架内再狭窄发生率:来自丹麦西部心脏注册研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb;81(2):260-5. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24398. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
6
Combining clinical and angiographic variables for estimating risk of target lesion revascularization after drug eluting stent placement.结合临床和血管造影变量以评估药物洗脱支架置入后靶病变血运重建的风险。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017 Apr-May;18(3):169-176. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.12.014. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
7
Clinical outcomes of the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent in patients with in-stent restenosis: 2-year results from a pooled analysis.药物涂层支架治疗支架内再狭窄患者的临床结果:一项汇总分析的 2 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Sep;6(9):905-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.017. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
8
Efficacy of drug-eluting stents for treating in-stent restenosis of drug-eluting stents (from the Korean DES ISR multicenter registry study [KISS]).药物洗脱支架治疗药物洗脱支架内再狭窄的疗效(来自韩国 DES ISR 多中心注册研究[KISS])。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Mar 1;109(5):607-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.10.014. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
9
Everolimus-eluting stents versus sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents: two-year results from the Guthrie Health Off-Label Stent (GHOST) registry.依维莫司洗脱支架与西罗莫司或紫杉醇洗脱支架的比较:Guthrie 卫生保健非适应证支架(GHOST)注册研究的 2 年结果。
J Interv Cardiol. 2013 Apr;26(2):153-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2013.12016.x. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
10
Comparison of outcomes after treatment of in-stent restenosis using newer generation drug-eluting stents versus drug-eluting balloon: Patient-level pooled analysis of Korean Multicenter in-Stent Restenosis Registry.新一代药物洗脱支架与药物洗脱球囊治疗支架内再狭窄的疗效比较:韩国多中心支架内再狭窄登记研究的患者水平汇总分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 1;230:181-190. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.12.176. Epub 2016 Dec 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The Utility and Validation of SCAI-CSWG Stages in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction-Related Cardiogenic Shock.SCAI-CSWG分期在急性心肌梗死相关心源性休克患者中的效用及验证
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024 Nov 19;4(1):102461. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102461. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio as a risk factor of repeat revascularization among patients with acute coronary syndrome after first-time percutaneous coronary intervention.甘油三酯与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值作为首次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者再次血运重建的危险因素。
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Dec;11(12):5087-5095. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.26.
3
Incidence and predictors of target lesion failure in patients undergoing contemporary DES implantation-Individual patient data pooled analysis from 6 randomized controlled trials.当代 DES 植入术后患者靶病变失败的发生率及预测因素——来自 6 项随机对照试验的个体患者数据汇总分析。
Am Heart J. 2019 Jul;213:105-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.03.011. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
4
Relationship Between Operator Volume and Long-Term Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.术者手术量与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后长期结局的关系。
Circulation. 2019 Jan 22;139(4):458-472. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.033325.
5
Evaluation and efficacy of long length Pronova XR Bioabsorbable Polymer stent in the treatment of long coronary lesions.长节段Pronova XR生物可吸收聚合物支架治疗长冠状动脉病变的评估及疗效
Indian Heart J. 2017 Nov-Dec;69(6):690-694. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Coronary artery disease progression late after successful stent implantation.支架植入成功后晚期冠状动脉疾病进展。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Feb 28;59(9):793-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.024.
2
Continued benefit from paclitaxel-eluting compared with bare-metal stent implantation in saphenous vein graft lesions during long-term follow-up of the SOS (Stenting of Saphenous Vein Grafts) trial.在 SOS(静脉桥血管支架置入术)试验的长期随访中,紫杉醇洗脱支架与裸金属支架置入相比,在静脉桥病变中持续获益。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Feb;4(2):176-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.10.003.
3
Predicting restenosis of drug-eluting stents placed in real-world clinical practice: derivation and validation of a risk model from the EVENT registry.预测真实世界临床实践中药物洗脱支架再狭窄:EVENT 登记研究中风险模型的建立和验证。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Aug;3(4):327-34. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.946939. Epub 2010 Jul 6.
4
Effectiveness and safety of drug-eluting stents in vein grafts: a meta-analysis.药物洗脱支架在静脉移植物中的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Am Heart J. 2010 Feb;159(2):159-169.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.11.021.
5
Impact of target lesion and nontarget lesion cardiac events on 5-year clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting or bare-metal stenting.西罗莫司洗脱支架或裸金属支架置入术后靶病变和非靶病变心脏事件对5年临床结局的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jun;2(6):498-503. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.03.013.
6
Safety and efficacy of drug-eluting and bare metal stents: comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized trials and observational studies.药物洗脱支架和裸金属支架的安全性与有效性:随机试验和观察性研究的综合荟萃分析
Circulation. 2009 Jun 30;119(25):3198-206. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.826479. Epub 2009 Jun 15.
7
Unrestricted use of drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents in routine clinical practice: findings from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry.在常规临床实践中药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架的 unrestricted 使用:来自美国国立心肺血液研究所动态注册研究的结果。(注:这里“unrestricted”翻译为“无限制的”,但感觉表述不太准确,可能原文有特定含义,需结合更多背景理解)
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Nov 20;50(21):2029-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.071.
8
Outcomes of 6906 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of drug-eluting stents: report of the DEScover Registry.药物洗脱支架时代6906例接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的结局:DEScover注册研究报告
Circulation. 2006 Nov 14;114(20):2154-62. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.667915. Epub 2006 Oct 23.
9
Primary Stenting of Totally Occluded Native Coronary Arteries II (PRISON II): a randomized comparison of bare metal stent implantation with sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of total coronary occlusions.完全闭塞的自身冠状动脉原发性支架置入术II(PRISON II):裸金属支架植入与西罗莫司洗脱支架植入治疗冠状动脉完全闭塞的随机对照研究
Circulation. 2006 Aug 29;114(9):921-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.613588. Epub 2006 Aug 14.
10
Bare metal stent restenosis is not a benign clinical entity.裸金属支架再狭窄并非一种良性临床情况。
Am Heart J. 2006 Jun;151(6):1260-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.08.011.

药物洗脱支架植入术后靶血管血运重建的临床表现及预测因素

Clinical presentation and predictors of target vessel revascularization after drug-eluting stent implantation.

作者信息

Al Muradi Hazem, Mehra Aditya, Okolo Joseph, Vlachos Helen, Selzer Faith, Marroquin Oscar C, Skelding Kimberly, Holper Elizabeth M, Williams David O, Abbott J Dawn

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University, 593 Eddy St, Providence, RI 02903, USA.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2012 Nov-Dec;13(6):311-5. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2012.10.003.

DOI:10.1016/j.carrev.2012.10.003
PMID:23164476
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3504351/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Drug eluting stent (DES) failure including restenosis and stent thrombosis, or disease progression may result in target vessel revascularization (TVR) but the relative contribution of these mechanisms in the DES era is not well described. We sought to examine the predictors and presentations of patients with clinically driven TVR after DES.

METHODS

Patients with all lesions treated with a DES in the Dynamic Registry from 2004 to 2006 were analyzed. Included were 2691 patients with 3401 lesions. Patients with and without incident clinically driven TVR at 2years were compared according to baseline clinical, procedural, and angiographic characteristics and independent predictors of TVR and target lesion revascularization (TLR) were determined by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

By 2-years, TVR occurred in 7.2% of patients and TLR in 3.8%, with 71.6% and 82.5% of repeat revascularization events occurring in the first year, respectively. The indication for first TVR was myocardial infarction in 18.6% (n=34), unstable angina in 42.6% (n=78), stable coronary disease in 25.7% (n=47) and other/unknown in 13.1% (n=24). Disease progression was responsible for 47% of TVR. Among patients with TLR, restenosis was the mechanism in 86.6% and stent thrombosis in 13.4%. Independent predictors of TVR included younger age, diabetes, attempted graft lesion, lesion length >30mm and prior lesion intervention. Independent predictors of TVR and TLR were similar.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of clinically driven TVR is low in patients treated with DES and nearly half is attributable to disease progression, which along with the low rate of in-stent restenosis explains why the mode of presentation is often an acute coronary syndrome.

摘要

背景

药物洗脱支架(DES)失败包括再狭窄和支架血栓形成,或疾病进展可能导致靶血管血运重建(TVR),但在DES时代这些机制的相对作用尚未得到充分描述。我们试图研究DES术后因临床因素导致TVR的患者的预测因素和临床表现。

方法

分析2004年至2006年动态注册研究中所有接受DES治疗病变的患者。纳入2691例患者的3401处病变。根据基线临床、手术和血管造影特征,比较2年时发生和未发生因临床因素导致TVR的患者,并通过多变量分析确定TVR和靶病变血运重建(TLR)的独立预测因素。

结果

到2年时,7.2%的患者发生TVR,3.8%的患者发生TLR,分别有71.6%和82.5%的再次血运重建事件发生在第一年。首次TVR的指征为心肌梗死占18.6%(n = 34),不稳定型心绞痛占42.6%(n = 78),稳定型冠心病占25.7%(n = 47),其他/不明占13.1%(n = 24)。疾病进展导致47%的TVR。在发生TLR的患者中,再狭窄是机制的占86.6%,支架血栓形成占13.4%。TVR的独立预测因素包括年轻、糖尿病、尝试移植病变、病变长度>30mm和既往病变干预。TVR和TLR的独立预测因素相似。

结论

DES治疗患者中因临床因素导致TVR的发生率较低,近一半归因于疾病进展,这与支架内再狭窄率低共同解释了为什么临床表现模式常为急性冠状动脉综合征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d199/3504351/635d6f1c0196/nihms412706f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d199/3504351/635d6f1c0196/nihms412706f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d199/3504351/635d6f1c0196/nihms412706f1.jpg