Suppr超能文献

轻度认知障碍亚型在记忆门诊患者中的患病率-两种轻度认知障碍分类模式的比较。维也纳转诊断痴呆研究结果。

Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment subtypes in patients attending a memory outpatient clinic--comparison of two modes of mild cognitive impairment classification. Results of the Vienna Conversion to Dementia Study.

机构信息

University Clinic of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Alzheimers Dement. 2013 Jul;9(4):366-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.12.009. Epub 2012 Nov 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early detection of dementia is becoming more and more important owing to the advent of pharmacologic treatment.

OBJECTIVE

The goals of this study were to establish prevalence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) subtypes in an outpatient memory clinic cohort using two different modes of MCI determination.

DESIGN

Consecutive patients complaining of cognitive problems who came to the memory outpatient clinic for assessment of a possible cognitive disorder were included in the study.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

Six hundred eighty consecutive patients complaining about cognitive problems who came to the memory outpatient clinic for assessment of a possible cognitive disorder and fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in the study. For 676 patients, sufficient data for MCI classification were available.

RESULTS

Categorizing MCI patients into MCI subtypes according to the minimum mode of MCI classification revealed the following results: 106 patients (15.7%) were categorized as cognitively healthy, whereas 570 patients (84.3%) met the criteria for MCI. MCI patients were subtyped as amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) single domain (31 patients; 4.6%), aMCI multiple domain (226 patients; 33.4%), non-aMCI single domain (125 patients; 18.5%), and non-aMCI multiple domain (188 patients; 27.8%). Categorizing MCI patients into MCI subtypes according to the mean mode of MCI classification revealed the following results: 409 patients (60.5%) were categorized as cognitively healthy, whereas 267 patients (39.5%) met the criteria for MCI. MCI patients were subtyped as aMCI single domain (47 patients; 6.9%), aMCI multiple domain (57 patients; 8.5%), non-aMCI single domain (97 patients; 14.3%), and non-aMCI multiple domain (66 patients; 9.8%).

CONCLUSION

MCI diagnosis frequencies are substantially affected by the criteria used for estimation of MCI. The effect of modifying the presence of impairment on a single cognitive measure versus the presence of impairment on a mean composite score of a certain domain differed considerably, ranging from 39.5% to 84.3%, indicating the importance of the development of guidelines for operationalizing MCI.

摘要

背景

由于药物治疗的出现,痴呆的早期检测变得越来越重要。

目的

本研究的目的是使用两种不同的 MCI 确定模式,在门诊记忆诊所队列中建立轻度认知障碍(MCI)亚型的患病率。

设计

连续出现认知问题并来记忆门诊评估可能认知障碍的患者被纳入本研究。

地点

学术医疗中心。

参与者

连续 680 名出现认知问题并来记忆门诊评估可能认知障碍且符合纳入标准的患者被纳入本研究。对于 676 名患者,有足够的数据进行 MCI 分类。

结果

根据 MCI 分类的最低模式将 MCI 患者分类为 MCI 亚型,结果如下:106 名患者(15.7%)被归类为认知健康,而 570 名患者(84.3%)符合 MCI 标准。MCI 患者被分为遗忘型轻度认知障碍(aMCI)单域(31 例;4.6%)、aMCI 多域(226 例;33.4%)、非 aMCI 单域(125 例;18.5%)和非 aMCI 多域(188 例;27.8%)。根据 MCI 分类的平均模式将 MCI 患者分类为 MCI 亚型,结果如下:409 名患者(60.5%)被归类为认知健康,而 267 名患者(39.5%)符合 MCI 标准。MCI 患者被分为 aMCI 单域(47 例;6.9%)、aMCI 多域(57 例;8.5%)、非 aMCI 单域(97 例;14.3%)和非 aMCI 多域(66 例;9.8%)。

结论

MCI 诊断频率受用于估计 MCI 的标准影响很大。改变单个认知测量的损害存在与改变特定域的平均综合评分的损害存在的影响差异很大,范围从 39.5%到 84.3%,这表明制定操作 MCI 的指南的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验