Unità Operativa di Cardiochirurgia, Dipartimento Cardio-nefro-polmonare, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Italy.
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 30;168(2):1028-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.10.030. Epub 2012 Nov 17.
The study compares five-year clinical outcomes of CABG vs PCI in a real world population of diabetic patients with multivessel coronary disease since it is not clear whether to prefer surgical or percutaneous revascularization.
Between July 2002 and December 2008, 2885 multivessel coronary diabetic patients underwent revascularization (1466 CABG and 1419 PCI) at hospitals in Emilia-Romagna Region, Italy and were followed for 1827 ± 617 days by record linkage of two clinical registries with the regional administrative database of hospital admissions and the mortality registry. Five-year incidences of MACCE (mortality, acute myocardial infarction [AMI], stroke, and repeat revascularization [TVR]) were assessed with Kaplan-Meier estimates, Cox proportional hazards regression and cumulative incidence functions of death and TVR, to evaluate the competing risk of AMI on death and TVR. The same analyses were applied to the propensity score matched subgroup of patients undergoing CABG or PCI with DES and with complete revascularization.
PCI had higher mortality for all causes (HR: 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.2 p<0.0001), AMI (HR: 3.3, 95% CI 2.4-4.6 p<0.0001) and TVR (HR: 4.5, 95% CI 3.4-6.1 p<0.0001). No significant differences emerged for stroke (HR: 0.8, 95% CI 0.5-1.2 p=0.26). The higher incidence of AMI caused higher mortality in PCI group. Results did not change comparing CABG with PCI patients receiving complete revascularization or DES only.
Diabetics show a higher incidence of MACCE with PCI than with CABG: thus diabetes and its degree of control should be considered when choosing the type of revascularization.
本研究比较了在意大利艾米利亚-罗马涅地区的多血管病变糖尿病患者中,CABG 与 PCI 的 5 年临床结果,因为目前尚不清楚是更倾向于采用外科或经皮血运重建。
在 2002 年 7 月至 2008 年 12 月期间,2885 名多血管病变的糖尿病患者在艾米利亚-罗马涅地区的医院接受了血运重建(CABG 1466 例,PCI 1419 例),通过两个临床注册中心与区域行政医院住院和死亡率登记处的记录链接进行了 1827±617 天的随访。使用 Kaplan-Meier 估计、Cox 比例风险回归和死亡和 TVR 的累积发生率函数评估了 5 年 MACCE(死亡率、急性心肌梗死[AMI]、卒中和再次血运重建[TVR])发生率,以评估 AMI 对死亡和 TVR 的竞争风险。对接受 CABG 或 PCI 治疗的患者进行了倾向评分匹配亚组分析,这些患者使用 DES 进行完全血运重建。
PCI 的全因死亡率更高(HR:1.8,95%CI 1.4-2.2,p<0.0001)、AMI(HR:3.3,95%CI 2.4-4.6,p<0.0001)和 TVR(HR:4.5,95%CI 3.4-6.1,p<0.0001)。卒中无显著差异(HR:0.8,95%CI 0.5-1.2,p=0.26)。PCI 组较高的 AMI 发生率导致死亡率较高。在比较完全血运重建或仅使用 DES 的 CABG 与 PCI 患者时,结果没有变化。
糖尿病患者 PCI 后的 MACCE 发生率高于 CABG:因此,在选择血运重建类型时,应考虑糖尿病及其控制程度。