Genther Dane J, Gourin Christine G
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Nov;138(11):1015-22. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.611.
To determine the association between safety-net hospital care and short-term outcomes after head and neck cancer surgery.
Cross-sectional analysis. Safety-net burden was calculated as the percentage of patients with head and neck cancer with Medicaid or no insurance.
Nationwide Inpatient Sample database.
Adults who underwent an ablative procedure for a malignant oral cavity, laryngeal, hypopharyngeal, or oropharyngeal neoplasm in 2001 through 2008.
Associations between hospital safety-net burden and short-term morality, medical and surgical complications, length of hospitalization, and costs.
Overall, 123 662 patients underwent surgery in 2001 through 2008. Patients treated at high-safety-net burden hospitals were significantly more likely to be admitted urgently or emergently (odds ratio [OR], 1.54; 95% CI, 1.06-1.15 [P = .03]), undergo major surgical procedures (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.09-1.39 [P = .001]), have advanced comorbidity (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.06-1.72 [P = .02]), and be black (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.29-2.23 [P < .001]), but less likely to be elderly (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53-0.82 [P < .001]). High safety-net burden hospitals were significantly more likely to be teaching hospitals (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.26-3.29 [P = .004]) and less likely to be located in the West (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.07-0.44 [P < .001]). Safety-net burden was not associated with in-hospital mortality, acute medical complications, surgical complications, or hospital-related costs after controlling for all other variables including hospital volume status, but was associated with a mean increase in length of hospitalization of 24 hours (P < .001).
These data suggest that safety-net hospitals provide valuable specialty care to a vulnerable population without an increase in complications or costs. Health care reform must address the economic challenges that threaten the viability of these institutions at the same time that demand for their services increases.
确定安全网医院护理与头颈癌手术后短期预后之间的关联。
横断面分析。安全网负担以患有医疗补助或无保险的头颈癌患者的百分比来计算。
全国住院患者样本数据库。
2001年至2008年接受口腔、喉、下咽或口咽恶性肿瘤切除手术的成年人。
医院安全网负担与短期死亡率、内科和外科并发症、住院时间及费用之间的关联。
总体而言,2001年至2008年有123662例患者接受了手术。在安全网负担高的医院接受治疗的患者更有可能被紧急或急诊收治(优势比[OR],1.54;95%可信区间[CI],1.06 - 1.15[P = 0.03]),接受大型外科手术(OR,1.24;95%CI,1.09 - 1.39[P = 0.001]),有晚期合并症(OR,1.35;95%CI,1.06 - 1.72[P = 0.02]),且为黑人(OR,1.70;95%CI,1.29 - 2.23[P < 0.001]),但不太可能是老年人(OR,0.66;95%CI,0.53 - 0.82[P < 0.001])。安全网负担高的医院更有可能是教学医院(OR,2.04;95%CI,1.26 - 3.29[P = 0.004]),且位于西部的可能性较小(OR,0.18;95%CI,0.07 - 0.44[P < 0.001])。在控制了包括医院规模状况等所有其他变量后,安全网负担与院内死亡率、急性内科并发症、外科并发症或与医院相关的费用无关,但与住院时间平均增加24小时有关(P < 0.001)。
这些数据表明,安全网医院为弱势群体提供了有价值的专科护理,且未增加并发症或费用。医疗改革必须在对这些机构服务需求增加的同时,应对威胁其生存能力的经济挑战。