Suppr超能文献

美国医院安全网负担对院内心脏骤停结局的影响。

Impact of Hospital Safety-Net Burden on Outcomes of In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the United States.

作者信息

Olanipekun Titilope, Abe Temidayo, Chris-Olaiya Abimbola, Effoe Valery S, Bhardwaj Abhishek, Harrison Michael F, Moreno Franco Pablo, Guru Pramod, Sanghavi Devang

机构信息

Department of Hospital Medicine, Covenant Health System, Knoxville, TN.

Department of Internal Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

出版信息

Crit Care Explor. 2023 Jan 9;5(1):e0838. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000838. eCollection 2023 Jan.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

High safety-net burden hospitals (HBHs) treating large numbers of uninsured or Medicaid-insured patients have generally been linked to worse clinical outcomes. However, limited data exist on the impact of the hospitals' safety-net burden on in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) outcomes in the United States.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the differences in survival to discharge, routine discharge home, and healthcare resource utilization between patients at HBH with those treated at low safety-net burden hospital (LBH).

DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Retrospective cohort study across hospitals in the United States: Hospitalized patients greater than or equal to 18 years that underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) between 2008 and 2018 identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Database. Data analysis was conducted in January 2022.

EXPOSURE

IHCA.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome is survival to hospital discharge. Other outcomes are routine discharge home among survivors, length of hospital stay, and total hospitalization cost.

RESULTS

From 2008 to 2018, an estimated 555,016 patients were hospitalized with IHCA, of which 19.2% occurred at LBH and 55.2% at HBH. Compared with LBH, patients at HBH were younger (62 ± 20 yr vs 67 ± 17 yr) and predominantly in the lowest median household income (< 25th percentile). In multivariate analysis, HBH was associated with lower chances of survival to hospital discharge (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.85-0.96) and lower odds of routine discharge (aOR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.47-0.75), compared with LBH. In addition, IHCA patients at publicly owned hospitals and those with medium and large hospital bed size were less likely to survive to hospital discharge, while patients with median household income greater than 25th percentile had better odds of hospital survival.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Our study suggests that patients who experience IHCA at HBH may have lower rates and odds of in-hospital survival and are less likely to be routinely discharged home after CPR. Median household income and hospital-level characteristics appear to contribute to survival.

摘要

未标注

收治大量未参保或参加医疗补助保险患者的高安全网负担医院(HBHs)通常与较差的临床结局相关。然而,关于美国医院安全网负担对院内心脏骤停(IHCA)结局影响的数据有限。

目的

比较高安全网负担医院(HBH)患者与低安全网负担医院(LBH)患者出院生存、常规出院回家以及医疗资源利用情况的差异。

设计、设置与参与者:美国医院的回顾性队列研究:从全国住院患者数据库中识别出2008年至2018年间接受心肺复苏(CPR)的18岁及以上住院患者。数据分析于2022年1月进行。

暴露因素

院内心脏骤停(IHCA)。

主要结局与测量指标

主要结局是出院生存。其他结局包括幸存者常规出院回家、住院时间以及总住院费用。

结果

2008年至2018年,估计有555,016例患者因院内心脏骤停住院,其中19.2%发生在低安全网负担医院(LBH),55.2%发生在高安全网负担医院(HBH)。与低安全网负担医院(LBH)相比,高安全网负担医院(HBH)的患者更年轻(62±20岁对67±17岁),且主要来自家庭收入中位数最低的人群(低于第25百分位数)。在多变量分析中,与低安全网负担医院(LBH)相比,高安全网负担医院(HBH)患者出院生存的几率较低(调整后的优势比[aOR],0.88;95%置信区间[CI],0.85 - 0.96),常规出院的几率也较低(aOR,0.6;95% CI,0.47 -

0.75)。此外,公立医院的院内心脏骤停患者以及拥有中大型病床规模医院的患者出院生存的可能性较小,而家庭收入中位数高于第25百分位数的患者医院生存几率更高。

结论与意义

我们的研究表明,在高安全网负担医院(HBH)发生院内心脏骤停的患者院内生存率和几率可能较低,心肺复苏后常规出院回家的可能性也较小。家庭收入中位数和医院层面特征似乎对生存有影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40f5/9831170/a2e367338d2d/cc9-5-e0838-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验