• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年抑郁筛查阳性后持续存在的预测因素。

Predictors of persistence after a positive depression screen among adolescents.

机构信息

Departments of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98121, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2012 Dec;130(6):e1541-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0450. Epub 2012 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1542/peds.2012-0450
PMID:23166342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3507250/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine predictors of depression persistence after a positive screening test to inform management protocols for screened youth.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study of 444 youth (aged 13-17 years) from a large health care delivery system. Youth with depressive symptoms, based on a 2-item depression screen, were oversampled for the baseline interview. Baseline assessments included the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item (PHQ-9) depression screen as well as clinical factors that were hypothesized to influence depression persistence (family history of depression, functional impairment, perceived social support, anxiety symptoms, externalizing symptoms, and medical comorbidity). Logistic regression analysis was used to examine factors associated with the persistence of depression at 6 months postbaseline.

RESULTS

Of 113 youth with a positive baseline screen (PHQ-9 ≥11), 47% and 35% continued to be positive at 6-week and 6-month follow-up, respectively. After controlling for treatment status, only 2 factors were significantly associated with depression persistence at 6 months: baseline depressive symptom score and continuing to have a positive screen at 6 weeks. For each 1-point increase on the PHQ-9 score at baseline, youth had a 16% increased odds of continuing to be depressed at 6 months (odds ratio: 1.16, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.34). Youth who continued to screen positive 6 weeks later had almost 3 times the odds of being depressed at 6 months (odds ratio: 2.89, 95% confidence interval: 1.09-7.61).

CONCLUSIONS

Depressive symptom severity at presentation and continued symptoms at 6 weeks postscreening are the strongest predictors of depression persistence. Patients with high depressive symptom scores and continued symptoms at 6 weeks should receive active treatment.

摘要

目的

探讨抑郁筛查呈阳性后的抑郁持续存在的预测因素,为筛查后青少年的管理方案提供依据。

方法

我们对来自大型医疗服务系统的 444 名青少年(年龄 13-17 岁)进行了队列研究。根据 2 项抑郁筛查,对有抑郁症状的青少年进行了基线访谈的超额抽样。基线评估包括患者健康问卷 9 项(PHQ-9)抑郁筛查以及假设影响抑郁持续存在的临床因素(抑郁家族史、功能障碍、感知社会支持、焦虑症状、外化症状和合并症)。采用逻辑回归分析来检查与基线后 6 个月抑郁持续存在相关的因素。

结果

在 113 名基线筛查阳性(PHQ-9≥11)的青少年中,分别有 47%和 35%在 6 周和 6 个月随访时仍为阳性。在控制治疗状态后,仅有 2 个因素与 6 个月时的抑郁持续存在显著相关:基线抑郁症状评分和 6 周时仍为阳性的筛查。PHQ-9 基线评分每增加 1 分,青少年在 6 个月时继续抑郁的几率增加 16%(比值比:1.16,95%置信区间:1.01-1.34)。6 周后继续筛查阳性的青少年在 6 个月时抑郁的几率几乎增加了 3 倍(比值比:2.89,95%置信区间:1.09-7.61)。

结论

就诊时的抑郁症状严重程度和筛查后 6 周的持续症状是抑郁持续存在的最强预测因素。PHQ-9 评分高且 6 周后持续存在症状的患者应接受积极治疗。

相似文献

1
Predictors of persistence after a positive depression screen among adolescents.青少年抑郁筛查阳性后持续存在的预测因素。
Pediatrics. 2012 Dec;130(6):e1541-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0450. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
2
The 12-Month Incidence and Predictors of PHQ-9-Screened Depressive Symptoms in Chinese Primary Care Patients.中国基层医疗患者中PHQ-9筛查出的抑郁症状的12个月发病率及预测因素
Ann Fam Med. 2016 Jan-Feb;14(1):47-53. doi: 10.1370/afm.1854.
3
Personality Disorders in Primary Care: Impact on Depression Outcomes Within Collaborative Care.初级保健中的人格障碍:对协作护理中抑郁症治疗结果的影响
J Prim Care Community Health. 2017 Oct;8(4):233-238. doi: 10.1177/2150131917714929. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
4
Baseline screening tools as indicators for symptom outcomes and health services utilization in a collaborative care model for depression in primary care: a practice-based observational study.基层医疗中抑郁症协作护理模式下作为症状转归和卫生服务利用指标的基线筛查工具:一项基于实践的观察性研究
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014 Nov-Dec;36(6):563-9. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.06.014. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
5
Evaluation of the PHQ-2 as a brief screen for detecting major depression among adolescents.PHQ-2 作为一种简短的筛查工具在青少年中检测重度抑郁症的评估。
Pediatrics. 2010 May;125(5):e1097-103. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2712. Epub 2010 Apr 5.
6
Factors associated with detection and receipt of treatment for youth with depression and anxiety disorders.与青少年抑郁和焦虑障碍的检测和治疗相关的因素。
Acad Pediatr. 2010 Jan-Feb;10(1):36-40. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2009.09.011.
7
Using the PHQ-9 for depression screening and treatment monitoring for Chinese Americans in primary care.使用患者健康问卷-9对初级保健中的华裔美国人进行抑郁症筛查和治疗监测。
Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Jul;57(7):976-81. doi: 10.1176/ps.2006.57.7.976.
8
Quality of mental health care for youth with asthma and comorbid anxiety and depression.患有哮喘以及合并焦虑和抑郁的青少年的心理健康护理质量。
Med Care. 2006 Dec;44(12):1064-72. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000237421.17555.8f.
9
Gastrointestinal symptoms in primary care: prevalence and association with depression and anxiety.基层医疗中的胃肠道症状:患病率及其与抑郁和焦虑的关联。
J Psychosom Res. 2008 Jun;64(6):605-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.02.019. Epub 2008 Apr 28.
10
What clinical differences distinguish depressed teens with and without comorbid externalizing problems?患有共病外化问题的抑郁青少年与无共病外化问题的抑郁青少年有哪些临床差异?
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2013 Jul-Aug;35(4):444-7. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.04.002. Epub 2013 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Collaborative Care on Persistent Postconcussive Symptoms in Adolescents: A Randomized Clinical Trial.协作护理对青少年持续性脑震荡后症状的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e210207. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0207.
2
Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Young People and Their Carers: a Mixed-Method Feasibility Study.针对青少年及其照顾者的基于正念的认知疗法:一项混合方法可行性研究。
Mindfulness (N Y). 2018;9(4):1063-1075. doi: 10.1007/s12671-017-0842-7. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
3
Health risk behavior among chronically ill adolescents: a systematic review of assessment tools.慢性病青少年的健康风险行为:评估工具的系统评价
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2017 Jul 17;11:32. doi: 10.1186/s13034-017-0172-5. eCollection 2017.
4
Long-term Results from the Empowering a Multimodal Pathway Toward Healthy Youth Program, a Multimodal School-Based Approach, Show Marked Reductions in Suicidality, Depression, and Anxiety in 6,227 Students in Grades 6-12 (Aged 11-18).“助力青少年健康多模式项目”(一种基于学校的多模式方法)的长期结果显示,6227名6至12年级(11至18岁)学生的自杀倾向、抑郁和焦虑显著降低。
Front Psychiatry. 2017 May 15;8:81. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00081. eCollection 2017.
5
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a mindfulness training programme in schools compared with normal school provision (MYRIAD): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.与常规学校教育相比,学校正念训练计划的有效性和成本效益(MYRIAD):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Apr 26;18(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1917-4.
6
Mediators and Moderators of a School-Based Cognitive-Behavioral Depression Prevention Program.基于学校的认知行为抑郁预防计划的调解人和调节因素。
Cognit Ther Res. 2016 Oct;40(5):705-716. doi: 10.1007/s10608-016-9780-2. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
7
Collaborative Care for Adolescents With Persistent Postconcussive Symptoms: A Randomized Trial.对患有持续性脑震荡后症状的青少年的协作式护理:一项随机试验。
Pediatrics. 2016 Oct;138(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-0459. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
8
Usual Care for Adolescent Depression From Symptom Identification Through Treatment Initiation.青少年抑郁症从症状识别到开始治疗的常规护理。
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Apr;170(4):373-80. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.4158.
9
Barriers and facilitators for mental healthcare in pediatric lupus and mixed connective tissue disease: a qualitative study of youth and parent perspectives.儿童狼疮和混合性结缔组织病心理保健的障碍与促进因素:一项关于青少年和家长观点的定性研究
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2015 Nov 24;13:52. doi: 10.1186/s12969-015-0049-1.
10
Twelve-Month Outcomes of a Randomized Trial of the Positive Thoughts and Action Program for Depression Among Early Adolescents.青少年早期抑郁症积极思维与行动项目随机试验的12个月结果
Prev Sci. 2016 Apr;17(3):295-305. doi: 10.1007/s11121-015-0615-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Item for detecting major depression among adolescents.青少年患者健康问卷-9 条目评估用于检测重度抑郁症。
Pediatrics. 2010 Dec;126(6):1117-23. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0852. Epub 2010 Nov 1.
2
Evaluation of the PHQ-2 as a brief screen for detecting major depression among adolescents.PHQ-2 作为一种简短的筛查工具在青少年中检测重度抑郁症的评估。
Pediatrics. 2010 May;125(5):e1097-103. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2712. Epub 2010 Apr 5.
3
Factors associated with detection and receipt of treatment for youth with depression and anxiety disorders.与青少年抑郁和焦虑障碍的检测和治疗相关的因素。
Acad Pediatr. 2010 Jan-Feb;10(1):36-40. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2009.09.011.
4
The Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS): outcomes over 1 year of naturalistic follow-up.青少年抑郁症治疗研究(TADS):1年自然随访结果
Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Oct;166(10):1141-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08111620. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
5
Anxiety and depression screening for youth in a primary care population.对基层医疗人群中的青少年进行焦虑和抑郁筛查。
Ambul Pediatr. 2008 May-Jun;8(3):182-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ambp.2008.01.003. Epub 2008 Apr 11.
6
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and routine specialist care with and without cognitive behaviour therapy in adolescents with major depression: randomised controlled trial.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)与针对重度抑郁症青少年的常规专科护理(有无认知行为疗法):随机对照试验
BMJ. 2007 Jul 21;335(7611):142. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39224.494340.55. Epub 2007 Jun 7.
7
Comparison of the PSC-17 and alternative mental health screens in an at-risk primary care sample.在一个处于风险中的初级保健样本中对PSC-17与其他心理健康筛查工具的比较。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007 May;46(5):611-618. doi: 10.1097/chi.0b013e318032384b.
8
Quality of mental health care for youth with asthma and comorbid anxiety and depression.患有哮喘以及合并焦虑和抑郁的青少年的心理健康护理质量。
Med Care. 2006 Dec;44(12):1064-72. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000237421.17555.8f.
9
Improving recognition of adolescent depression in primary care.提高初级保健中对青少年抑郁症的识别率。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Jul;160(7):694-704. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.160.7.694.
10
Quality of care for medicaid-covered youth treated with antidepressant therapy.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004 May;61(5):475-80. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.5.475.