Editor's report: scientific misconduct and the responsibility of journal editors.
作者信息
Yankauer A
出版信息
Am J Public Health. 1990 Apr;80(4):399-400. doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.4.399.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Editor's report: scientific misconduct and the responsibility of journal editors.编辑报告：科研不端行为与期刊编辑的责任
Am J Public Health. 1990 Apr;80(4):399-400. doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.4.399.
2
Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.科研不端行为以及编辑和同行评审过程。
J Higher Educ. 1994 May-Jun;65(3):298-309.
3
Editors call for misconduct watchdog.编辑们呼吁设立不当行为监督机构。
Science. 1998 Jun 12;280(5370):1685-6. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5370.1685b.
4
Editors' responsibility in defeating fraud.编辑在打击欺诈行为中的责任。
Nature. 1999 May 6;399(6731):13. doi: 10.1038/19837.
5
Accountability, audit, and reverence for the publication process.对发表过程的问责、审核及尊重。
JAMA. 1993 Jul 28;270(4):495-6.
6
Editors and auditors.
JAMA. 1989 May 5;261(17):2543-5.
7
Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An editor's response to fraudsters.应对英国的科研不端行为。一位编辑对欺诈者的回应。
BMJ. 1998 Jun 6;316(7146):1729-31.
8
Ensuring integrity in biomedical publication.确保生物医学出版物的完整性。
JAMA. 1987 Dec 18;258(23):3424-7.
9
Fraud in medicine. Coping with fraud.医学领域的欺诈行为。应对欺诈。
Lancet. 1998;352 Suppl 4:SIV11.
10
Fraud in biomedical science.生物医学领域的欺诈行为。
Natl Med J India. 1992 May-Jun;5(3):134-6.
引用本文的文献
1
The changing forms and expectations of peer review.同行评审不断变化的形式与期望。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2018 Sep 20;3:8. doi: 10.1186/s41073-018-0051-5. eCollection 2018.
本文引用的文献
1
In reply: scientific integrity.
Science. 1990 Jan 12;247(4939):145-6. doi: 10.1126/science.247.4939.145.
2
Government and quality in science.
Science. 1989 Nov 10;246(4931):736. doi: 10.1126/science.246.4931.736.
3
4
Prior publication, an ethical issue.
Am J Public Health. 1985 Apr;75(4):341-3. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.4.341.
5
Publish or perish: a proposal.不发表就灭亡：一项提议。
Ann Intern Med. 1986 Feb;104(2):261-2. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-104-2-261.
6
Irresponsible authorship and wasteful publication.不负责任的署名和浪费性的发表。
Ann Intern Med. 1986 Feb;104(2):257-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-104-2-257.
7
The pathogenesis of fraud in medical science.医学领域欺诈行为的发病机制。 （不过这里用“发病机制”表述不太准确，更合适的比如“成因”等，但按要求翻译就是这样）
Ann Intern Med. 1986 Feb;104(2):252-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-104-2-252.
8
How good is peer review?同行评审的效果如何？
N Engl J Med. 1989 Sep 21;321(12):827-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198909213211211.
9
Office of scientific integrity.科学诚信办公室。
Science. 1989 May 26;244(4907):903-4. doi: 10.1126/science.2543069.
10
Scientific integrity.
Science. 1990 Jan 12;247(4939):144-6. doi: 10.1126/science.2294598.
Zotero 插件