• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

委员会意见 No.545:胎儿非整倍体的无创性产前检测。

Committee Opinion No. 545: Noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Dec;120(6):1532-4. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000423819.85283.f4.

DOI:10.1097/01.AOG.0000423819.85283.f4
PMID:23168792
Abstract

Noninvasive prenatal testing that uses cell free fetal DNA from the plasma of pregnant women offers tremendous potential as a screening tool for fetal aneuploidy. Cell free fetal DNA testing should be an informed patient choice after pretest counseling and should not be part of routine prenatal laboratory assessment. Cell free fetal DNA testing should not be offered to low-risk women or women with multiple gestations because it has not been sufficiently evaluated in these groups. A negative cell free fetal DNA test result does not ensure an unaffected pregnancy. A patient with a positive test result should be referred for genetic counseling and should be offered invasive prenatal diagnosis for confirmation of test results.

摘要

利用孕妇血浆中的游离胎儿 DNA 进行的无创性产前检测作为胎儿非整倍体的筛查工具具有巨大的潜力。在进行检测前咨询后,应将游离胎儿 DNA 检测作为一项知情的患者选择,而不应该成为常规产前实验室评估的一部分。游离胎儿 DNA 检测不应提供给低风险女性或多胎妊娠女性,因为在这些人群中尚未充分评估其效果。阴性的游离胎儿 DNA 检测结果不能确保妊娠不受影响。阳性检测结果的患者应转介接受遗传咨询,并应提供侵入性产前诊断以确认检测结果。

相似文献

1
Committee Opinion No. 545: Noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy.委员会意见 No.545:胎儿非整倍体的无创性产前检测。
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Dec;120(6):1532-4. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000423819.85283.f4.
2
Committee Opinion No. 640: Cell-Free DNA Screening For Fetal Aneuploidy.第640号委员会意见:游离DNA筛查胎儿非整倍体。
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;126(3):e31-e37. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001051.
3
Committee Opinion Summary No. 640: Cell-Free DNA Screening For Fetal Aneuploidy.委员会意见摘要第640号:游离DNA筛查胎儿非整倍体
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;126(3):691-692. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000471171.86798.ac.
4
The use of cell-free fetal nucleic acids in maternal blood for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis.利用母体血液中的游离胎儿核酸进行无创产前诊断。
Hum Reprod Update. 2009 Jan-Feb;15(1):139-51. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmn047. Epub 2008 Oct 22.
5
Fetal aneuploidy detection by maternal plasma DNA sequencing: a technology assessment.母体血浆 DNA 测序检测胎儿非整倍体:一项技术评估。
Prenat Diagn. 2013 Jun;33(6):514-20. doi: 10.1002/pd.4109.
6
Israeli Society of Medical Genetics NIPT Committee Opinion 072013: Non-invasive prenatal testing of cell-free DNA in maternal plasma for detection of fetal aneuploidy.以色列医学遗传学学会无创产前检测委员会意见072013:孕妇血浆中游离DNA的无创产前检测用于胎儿非整倍体检测。
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;36(3):242-4. doi: 10.1159/000360420. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
7
Recent advances in non-invasive prenatal DNA diagnosis through analysis of maternal blood.通过分析孕妇血液进行无创产前DNA诊断的最新进展。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007 Dec;33(6):747-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2007.00652.x.
8
Noninvasive prenatal detection of aneuploidy.非整倍体的无创产前检测
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;57(1):210-25. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000016.
9
[New frontiers in noninvasive, prenatal screening and diagnosis: fetal DNA circulating in maternal blood].[无创产前筛查与诊断的新前沿:母体血液中循环的胎儿DNA]
Minerva Ginecol. 2007 Jun;59(3):331-41.
10
Reliable noninvasive prenatal testing by massively parallel sequencing of circulating cell-free DNA from maternal plasma processed up to 24h after venipuncture.通过对静脉穿刺后长达 24 小时的母体血浆中循环游离 DNA 进行大规模平行测序,实现可靠的无创性产前检测。
Clin Biochem. 2013 Dec;46(18):1783-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.07.020. Epub 2013 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Reappraising the Value of Fetal First-Trimester Ultrasonography.重新评估孕早期胎儿超声检查的价值
Matern Fetal Med. 2021 Dec 14;5(2):115-118. doi: 10.1097/FM9.0000000000000138. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Cesarean Delivery in Fetal Triploidy: Clinical Considerations and Case Study Insights.胎儿三倍体的剖宫产:临床考量与病例研究见解
Am J Case Rep. 2025 Mar 27;26:e946933. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.946933.
3
Comparing the Introduction and Implementation of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) in Japan, the Netherlands, and the United States: An Integrative Review.
日本、荷兰和美国无创产前检测(NIPT)的引入与实施比较:一项综合综述
Prenat Diagn. 2025 Jan 15. doi: 10.1002/pd.6708.
4
The implementation and impact of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for Down's syndrome into antenatal screening programmes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.非侵入性产前检测(NIPT)在唐氏综合征产前筛查项目中的实施和影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 May 16;19(5):e0298643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298643. eCollection 2024.
5
Approach and Management of Pregnancies with Risk Identified by Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing.无创产前检测识别出风险的妊娠的处理与管理
J Pers Med. 2024 Mar 29;14(4):366. doi: 10.3390/jpm14040366.
6
Expanding Use of cfDNA Screening in Pregnancy: Current and Emerging Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues.循环游离DNA筛查在孕期的应用拓展:当前及新出现的伦理、法律和社会问题
Curr Genet Med Rep. 2017 Mar;5(1):44-53. doi: 10.1007/s40142-017-0113-x. Epub 2017 Feb 11.
7
Prenatal diagnosis after high chance non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomies 21, 18 and 13, chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis? - Experience at a district general hospital in the United Kingdom.21、18和13三体综合征高风险无创产前检测后的产前诊断:绒毛取样还是羊膜穿刺术?——英国一家区综合医院的经验
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2023 Jul 1;19:100211. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100211. eCollection 2023 Sep.
8
Maternal and fetal factors influencing fetal fraction: A retrospective analysis of 153,306 pregnant women undergoing noninvasive prenatal screening.影响胎儿游离DNA比例的母胎因素:对153306例行无创产前筛查孕妇的回顾性分析
Front Pediatr. 2023 Apr 11;11:1066178. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1066178. eCollection 2023.
9
Non-invasive Prenatal Testing in Pregnancies Following Assisted Reproduction.辅助生殖后妊娠的无创产前检测
Curr Genomics. 2022 Nov 18;23(5):326-336. doi: 10.2174/1389202923666220518095758.
10
Factors affecting low fetal fraction in fetal screening with cell-free DNA in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.影响孕妇游离胎儿 DNA 筛查中低胎儿分数的因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Dec 8;22(1):918. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05224-7.