Department of Earth Science and Geography, Vassar College Poughkeepsie, New York, 12604, USA.
Ecol Evol. 2012 Nov;2(11):2815-28. doi: 10.1002/ece3.394. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
Sensitivity to habitat fragmentation often has been examined in terms of thresholds in landscape composition at which a species is likely to occur. Observed thresholds often have been low or absent, however, leaving much unexplained about habitat selection beyond initial thresholds of occurrence, even for species with strong habitat preferences. We examined responses to varying amounts of tree cover, a widely influential measure of habitat loss, for 40 woodland bird species in a mixed woodland/grassland landscape in eastern North Dakota, USA. We used LOESS smoothing to describe incidence for each species at three scales: within 200, 400, and 1200 m around sample locations. For the 200-m scale, we also calculated the most-preferred range of tree cover (within which at least half of observations were predicted to occur) for each species. Only 10 of 40 species had occurrence thresholds greater than about 10% tree cover. After initial occurrence, species showed three general patterns: some increased monotonically with tree cover; some increased up to an asymptote; some peaked at intermediate amounts of tree cover and then declined. These patterns approximate selection for interior woodlands and for edge-rich environments, but incidence plots provide greater detail in landscape-scale selection than do those categories. For most species, patterns persisted at larger scales, but for some, larger scales had distinctly different patterns than local scales. Preferred ranges of tree cover varied from <20% tree cover (common grackle, Quiscalus quiscula) to >60% (veery, Catharus fuscescens). We conclude that incidence patterns provide more information on habitat selection than do threshold measures for most species: in particular, they differentiate species preferring concentrated woodlands from those preferring mixed landscapes, and they show contrasting degrees of selectiveness. [Correction added on 16 October 2012, after first online publication: the Abstract section has been reworded].
对生境破碎化的敏感性通常通过物种可能出现的景观组成的阈值来研究。然而,观察到的阈值往往较低或不存在,这使得我们对发生初始阈值之外的生境选择仍有很多未解之谜,即使是对那些有强烈生境偏好的物种也是如此。我们在美国北达科他州东部的一个混合林地/草原景观中,研究了 40 种林地鸟类对不同数量的树木覆盖的反应,树木覆盖是衡量生境丧失的一个广泛影响的指标。我们使用 LOESS 平滑来描述每个物种在三个尺度上的发生率:在样本位置周围 200、400 和 1200 米范围内。对于 200 米的尺度,我们还计算了每个物种的最优选的树木覆盖范围(至少有一半的观察结果预计发生在这个范围内)。在 40 种物种中,只有 10 种物种的发生阈值大于约 10%的树木覆盖。在初始发生后,物种表现出三种一般模式:一些随着树木覆盖的增加而单调增加;一些增加到一个渐近线;一些在中等数量的树木覆盖下达到峰值,然后下降。这些模式近似于对内部林地和边缘丰富环境的选择,但发生率图提供了比这些类别更详细的景观尺度选择细节。对于大多数物种,这些模式在较大的尺度上持续存在,但对于一些物种,较大的尺度与局部尺度有明显不同的模式。树木覆盖的最优选范围从<20%的树木覆盖(普通八哥,Quiscalus quiscula)到>60%(褐林鸫,Catharus fuscescens)。我们的结论是,对于大多数物种来说,发生率模式比阈值测量提供了更多的关于生境选择的信息:特别是,它们将偏好集中林地的物种与偏好混合景观的物种区分开来,并显示出不同的选择性程度。