Acute Stroke Programme, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Level 7, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.
Curr Drug Targets. 2013 Jan 1;14(1):56-73. doi: 10.2174/138945013804806433.
Ischaemic stroke is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. While recombinant tissue plasminogen activator can be administered to produce thrombolysis and restore blood flow to the ischaemic brain, therapeutic benefit is only achieved in a fraction of the subset of patients eligible for fibrinolytic intervention. Neuroprotective therapies attempting to restrict the extent of brain injury following cerebral ischaemia have not been successfully translated into the clinic despite overwhelming pre-clinical evidence of neuroprotection. Therefore, an adequate treatment for the majority of acute ischaemic stroke patients remains elusive. In the stroke literature, the use of therapeutic gases has received relatively little attention. Gases such as hyperbaric and normobaric oxygen, xenon, hydrogen, helium and argon all possess biological effects that have shown to be neuroprotective in pre-clinical models of ischaemic stroke. There are significant advantages to using gases including their relative abundance, low cost and feasibility for administration, all of which make them ideal candidates for a translational therapy for stroke. In addition, modulating cellular gaseous mediators including nitric oxide, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen sulphide may be an attractive option for ischaemic stroke therapy. Inhalation of these gaseous mediators can also produce neuroprotection, but this strategy remains to be confirmed as a viable therapy for ischaemic stroke. This review highlights the neuroprotective potential of therapeutic gas therapy and modulation of gaseous mediators for ischaemic stroke. The therapeutic advantages of gaseous therapy offer new promising directions in breaking the translational barrier for ischaemic stroke.
缺血性中风是全球发病率和死亡率的主要原因之一。虽然可以使用重组组织纤溶酶原激活剂来进行溶栓治疗,以恢复缺血性大脑的血液流动,但治疗效果仅在有资格接受纤维蛋白溶解干预的患者亚组中获得。尽管有大量的临床前神经保护证据,但试图限制脑缺血后脑损伤程度的神经保护疗法尚未成功转化为临床应用。因此,对于大多数急性缺血性中风患者,仍然缺乏有效的治疗方法。在中风文献中,治疗性气体的应用相对较少受到关注。高压和常压氧、氙气、氢气、氦气和氩气等气体都具有生物效应,在缺血性中风的临床前模型中已显示出神经保护作用。使用气体有许多优势,包括其相对丰富、成本低和给药可行性,这使得它们成为中风转化治疗的理想候选物。此外,调节细胞气态介质,包括一氧化氮、一氧化碳和硫化氢,可能是缺血性中风治疗的一个有吸引力的选择。这些气态介质的吸入也可以产生神经保护作用,但这种策略作为缺血性中风的可行治疗方法仍有待证实。本文综述了治疗性气体治疗和调节气态介质对缺血性中风的神经保护潜力。气体治疗的治疗优势为缺血性中风的转化治疗提供了新的有希望的方向。