Comparison of otoplasty results using different types of suturing techniques.

BACKGROUND

Prominent ears are a common congenital deformity. Numerous techniques have been developed for the treatment of protruding ears, indicating that there is no single widely-accepted procedure. Modern otoplasty techniques fall into of two main surgical categories, (1) cartilage sparing (Mustardé & Furnas), and (2) cartilage cutting (Chongchet & Stenström). This study compares an antihelixmastoid suture technique with the normal Mustardé & Furnas technique.

METHODS

Within a 5-year period (between 2005 and 2009), 78 patients (mean age 27 years; range 7 to 46) underwent otoplasty performed by the senior author (in a private plastic surgery center), employing the posterior suturing technique (Mustardé & Furnas). Of these 78 patients, 44 underwent otoplasty which combined the usual posterior suturing technique with modification we have developed (antihelixmastoid sutures). Depending on the suture technique used, the patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (Mustardé & Furnas sutures), Group 2 (Mustardé & Furnas sutures with extra modification). Patients were invited for follow-up examinations 1 month and 1 year after surgery, and all of them attended both these follow-up checks, where recurrence and suture extrusion were evaluated.

RESULTS

Group 1: the clinical recurrence rate was 4.55% (3 ears). The suture extrusion rate was 7.6% (5 ears). Group 2: the clinical recurrence rate was 1.25% (1 ear). The suture extrusion rate was 7.5% (6 ears). Patients were generally satisfied with the results in terms of shape and symmetry. There were no complications such as haematoma, ear deformity and skin necrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior suturing with conchomastoid and modification of Mustardé sutures is a simple operation which can be performed quickly. It appears to be effective in terms of recurrence rate (especially in the upper segment) and patient satisfaction.