Mogensen Christian Backer, Thisted Anette Rehn, Olsen Inger
Akutafdelingen, Kolding Sygehus, Skovvangen, Kolding, Denmark.
Dan Med J. 2012 Nov;59(11):A4532.
Transferring a patient from one health-care sector to another implies a risk of medication errors. It is of interest to evaluate whether a specialist in clinical pharmacy is beneficial for the patients in the emergency departments (ED). The aim of the present study was to report the incidence, categories and seriousness of medication problems discovered by clinical pharmacists in an ED and to evaluate if it is possible for pharmacists to identify those groups of patients who are most at risk of medication problems.
A pharmacist reviewed the patient files in the ED. If the pharmacists provided any kind of recommendations, a note was made describing the problem and a suggestion for a solution. After the study period, two medical specialists reviewed the files and rated the suggestions according to four levels of importance.
A total of 1,696 patient files were reviewed after excluding patients who had received no medication. A total of 420 pharmacist notes were written, corresponding to 25% of all the included admissions. 47% of the pharmaceutical suggestions were considered serious. Increasing age and one drug as opposed to 2-9 drugs were associated with serious recommendations. In the multivariate analysis, only age above 70 years remained of significance for the identification of patients with a risk of a serious medication problem.
A considerable amount of serious pharmaceutical problems were found in the ED. These problems had not been observed by the physicians and they were especially prevalent among the elderly and patients who were only prescribed a single drug.
The Amgros research foundation financed salaries for the independent specialists who reviewed the patient files.
not relevant.
将患者从一个医疗保健部门转移到另一个部门意味着存在用药错误的风险。评估临床药学专家对急诊科患者是否有益是很有意义的。本研究的目的是报告临床药师在急诊科发现的用药问题的发生率、类别和严重程度,并评估药师是否有可能识别出那些用药问题风险最高的患者群体。
一名药师查阅了急诊科的患者档案。如果药师提供了任何类型的建议,都会记录下问题描述及解决方案建议。研究期结束后,两名医学专家查阅了这些档案,并根据四个重要性级别对建议进行评级。
在排除未用药的患者后,共查阅了1696份患者档案。共撰写了420份药师记录,占所有纳入入院病例的25%。47%的药学建议被认为是严重的。年龄增加以及使用一种药物而非2 - 9种药物与严重建议相关。在多变量分析中,只有70岁以上的年龄对于识别有严重用药问题风险的患者具有显著性。
在急诊科发现了大量严重的药学问题。这些问题医生并未观察到,且在老年人和仅开具一种药物的患者中尤为普遍。
Amgros研究基金会为查阅患者档案的独立专家支付薪酬。
不相关。