Suppr超能文献

耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术:开放手术与机器人辅助手术治疗前列腺癌的比较

Radical retropubic prostatectomy: comparison of the open and robotic approaches for treatment of prostate cancer.

作者信息

Tosoian Jeffrey J, Loeb Stacy

机构信息

The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Rev Urol. 2012;14(1-2):20-7.

Abstract

Radical prostatectomy represents the standard of care for surgical treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. First described in 1904, the operation became widely performed only after advances in diagnostic and surgical techniques occurred later in the century. Over time, open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) became the most common operation for prostate cancer, and excellent long-term survival outcomes have been reported. More recently, minimally invasive techniques such as the robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) were introduced. Despite a lack of prospectively collected, long-term data supporting its use, RALRP has overtaken RRP as the most frequently performed prostate cancer operation in the United States. This article uses currently available data to compare oncologic, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes associated with both the open and robotic approaches to radical prostatectomy.

摘要

根治性前列腺切除术是临床局限性前列腺癌手术治疗的标准方法。该手术于1904年首次被描述,直到本世纪后期诊断和手术技术取得进展后才被广泛开展。随着时间的推移,开放性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术(RRP)成为前列腺癌最常见的手术方式,并且已有报道称其长期生存效果良好。最近,诸如机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(RALRP)等微创技术被引入。尽管缺乏前瞻性收集的长期数据支持其应用,但RALRP已超过RRP,成为美国最常施行的前列腺癌手术。本文利用现有数据比较开放性和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术在肿瘤学、功能和生活质量方面的结果。

相似文献

3
Trends in treatment for localized prostate cancer after emergence of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in Taiwan.
J Chin Med Assoc. 2011 Apr;74(4):155-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2011.01.035. Epub 2011 Mar 15.
4
8
Prostatectomies for localized prostate cancer: a mixed comparison network and cumulative meta-analysis.
J Robot Surg. 2018 Dec;12(4):633-639. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0791-8. Epub 2018 Feb 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Pretreatment expectations of patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic or open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
J Urol. 2012 Mar;187(3):894-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.135. Epub 2012 Jan 15.
2
Radical prostatectomy: positive surgical margins matter.
Urol Oncol. 2013 Oct;31(7):974-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.12.011. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
3
Open vs. robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon and pathologist comparison of pathologic and oncologic outcomes.
Urol Oncol. 2013 Oct;31(7):1043-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.12.002. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
5
Outcomes for radical prostatectomy: is it the singer, the song, or both?
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Feb 10;30(5):476-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.9593. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
7
Administrative data sets are inaccurate for assessing functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy.
J Urol. 2011 May;185(5):1686-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.039. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
8
LAPPRO: a prospective multicentre comparative study of robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2011 Mar;45(2):102-12. doi: 10.3109/00365599.2010.532506. Epub 2010 Nov 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验