Suppr超能文献

保乳治疗后辅助放疗光子能量对生活质量的影响:直线加速器与钴机对比

Impact of adjuvant radiation therapy photon energy on quality of life after breast conservation therapy: linear accelerator versus the cobalt machine.

作者信息

Munshi Anusheel, Dutta Debnarayan, Budrukkar Ashwini, Jalali Rakesh, Sarin Rajiv, Gupta Sudeep, Ghosh Jaya, Bajpai Jyoti, Parmar Vani, Nair Nita, Badwe Rajendra

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.

出版信息

J Cancer Res Ther. 2012 Jul-Sep;8(3):361-6. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.103513.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Breast conservative therapy (BCT) is a standard treatment option in early operable breast cancers (OBC) and a select group of large or locally advanced tumors. The present study deals with prospective evaluation of quality of life (QOL) score in consecutive patients treated with BCT employing adjuvant RT treated with either a cobalt machine or a linear accelerator (LA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients of carcinoma breast who underwent BCT were taken into the study. Patients with larger breasts (inter-field separation >18-20 cm) were treated on LA and those with smaller breasts were treated on cobalt machine. All patients received a uniform RT dose (45-50 Gy/25#/5 weeks) to whole breast followed by tumor bed boost with suitable energy electrons. Prospective evaluation of QOL was done using EORTC QLQ C30 and breast cancer-specific EORTC QLQ BR23. QOL evaluation was done at pre-RT, at half completion of RT treatment (at 20-23 fractions) and at completion of RT.

RESULTS

Pre-RT evaluation GQOL scores in patients treated with cobalt and LA were 71.6 and 71.7, respectively (P = 0.8). QLQ C30 functional and symptom domain scores were also similar in the groups. At RT completion, Global quality of life (GQOL) scores were 67.7 in patients treated with cobalt as compared to 77.7 in patients treated with LA (P = 0.75). Physical function domain scores in cobalt and LA patients were 70.8 and 80.3, respectively (P = 0.26). Fatigue score was higher in patients treated with cobalt (39.1 versus 29.7; P = 0.9). However, there was no difference in other functional and symptom domains. There was no significant change in any of the EORTC QLQ C30 domains at RT completion as compared to the pre-RT scores.

CONCLUSION

There is no significant difference in QOL domains between appropriately selected patients treated with cobalt and LA. There are no significant changes in QOL domain scores at RT conclusion as compared to pre-RT baseline in patients treated with cobalt or LA source. A cobalt machine may be effectively used to deliver adjuvant RT in appropriately selected BCT patients especially in developing countries with limited resources.

摘要

背景

保乳治疗(BCT)是早期可手术乳腺癌(OBC)以及部分大的或局部晚期肿瘤的标准治疗选择。本研究旨在对连续接受BCT并采用钴机或直线加速器(LA)进行辅助放疗的患者的生活质量(QOL)评分进行前瞻性评估。

材料与方法

选取接受BCT的乳腺癌患者纳入研究。乳房较大(射野间距>18 - 20 cm)的患者采用LA治疗,乳房较小的患者采用钴机治疗。所有患者全乳均接受统一的放疗剂量(45 - 50 Gy/25次/5周),随后用合适能量的电子线对瘤床进行加量照射。使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)QLQ C30量表和乳腺癌特异性的EORTC QLQ BR23量表对QOL进行前瞻性评估。QOL评估在放疗前、放疗疗程过半(20 - 23次分割时)以及放疗结束时进行。

结果

放疗前,使用钴机和LA治疗的患者的总体生活质量(GQOL)评分分别为71.6和71.7(P = 0.8)。两组的QLQ C30功能和症状领域评分也相似。放疗结束时,使用钴机治疗的患者的全球生活质量(GQOL)评分为67.7,而使用LA治疗的患者为77.7(P = 0.75)。使用钴机和LA治疗的患者的身体功能领域评分分别为70.8和80.3(P = 0.26)。使用钴机治疗的患者的疲劳评分更高(39.1对29.7;P = 0.9)。然而,在其他功能和症状领域没有差异。与放疗前评分相比,放疗结束时EORTC QLQ C30的任何领域均无显著变化。

结论

在适当选择的患者中,使用钴机和LA治疗的QOL领域没有显著差异。与放疗前基线相比,使用钴机或LA治疗的患者在放疗结束时QOL领域评分没有显著变化。钴机可有效地用于为适当选择的BCT患者提供辅助放疗,特别是在资源有限的发展中国家。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验