Pulmonary and Critical Care Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 02114 Boston, MA USA.
Minerva Anestesiol. 2013 Jan;79(1):33-43. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
Significant debate continues over the efficacy of drotrecogin alpha activated (DAA) in sepsis. This updated meta-analysis provides an updated summary effect estimate and explores the reasons for outcome heterogeneity in placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials of DAA on 28-day all-cause mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.
Computer searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, published abstracts from major intensive care meetings and examination of reference lists were used to identify five placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials with 7260 patients. The primary endpoint was 28-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were 28-day incidence of severe bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage.
DAA was not associated with improved 28-day all-cause mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock (pooled relative risk (RR) of 0.97 [95% CI 0.83-1.14]), and is associated with an increase in serious bleeding. The significant heterogeneity in the pooled RR for 28-day mortality (I2 value of 59.4%, χ2 P-value 0.043) is no longer present with exclusion of the post-study amendment portion of PROWESS (I2 value of 0%, χ2 P-value 0.44 without PROWESS post-amendment). Using meta-regression, the best ranked predictor of outcome heterogeneity was baseline mortality in the placebo arm, which was among the highest in PROWESS.
DAA is not associated with improved survival in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Further studies should be done to determine whether changes in supportive therapy for sepsis explain the variable efficacy of DAA in randomized controlled clinical trials observed over time.
关于激活的人重组组织型纤溶酶原激活物(Drotrecogin Alpha)在脓毒症中的疗效仍存在较大争议。本更新的荟萃分析提供了更新的汇总效果估计,并探讨了在严重脓毒症或感染性休克患者中,安慰剂对照随机临床试验中 Drotrecogin Alpha 对 28 天全因死亡率的影响存在结局异质性的原因。
计算机检索 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆、ClinicalTrials.gov,查阅主要重症监护会议的已发表摘要,并查阅参考文献,共纳入了五项安慰剂对照随机临床试验,涉及 7260 例患者。主要终点为 28 天全因死亡率。次要结局为 28 天严重出血和颅内出血的发生率。
Drotrecogin Alpha 并未改善严重脓毒症或感染性休克患者的 28 天全因死亡率(汇总相对风险(RR)为 0.97 [95%CI 0.83-1.14]),反而与严重出血风险增加相关。28 天死亡率的汇总 RR 存在显著异质性(I2 值为 59.4%,χ2 P 值为 0.043),但排除 PROWESS 研究后修正案部分后,该异质性消失(I2 值为 0%,χ2 P 值为 0.44,无 PROWESS 后修正案)。采用 meta 回归,结局异质性的最佳预测因子是安慰剂组的基线死亡率,该值在 PROWESS 中最高。
Drotrecogin Alpha 与严重脓毒症或感染性休克患者的生存率提高无关。应进一步研究是否支持脓毒症的治疗方法的改变可以解释在随机对照临床试验中观察到的 Drotrecogin Alpha 疗效的差异。