Department of Biology, Unit of Morphological and Molecular Pathology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille Cedex, France.
Mod Pathol. 2013 Apr;26(4):502-10. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2012.192. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
Immunohistochemical use of myogenic markers serves to define smooth or skeletal muscle differentiation in soft tissue tumors. Establishing smooth muscle differentiation in malignant lesions can be challenging in some cases. We immunohistochemically examined 900 soft tissue tumors selected from the French Sarcoma Group's archived tissue collection, which contains a large number of leiomyosarcomas. The four most widely used smooth muscle diagnostic markers were evaluated (smooth muscle actin, desmin, h-caldesmon and calponin), and compared with a novel marker, transgelin. The diagnostic performance of each marker was statistically assessed in terms of sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy (A), in leiomyosarcomas versus all other sarcomas including gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), and second in leiomyosarcomas versus specific tumor types. In leiomyosarcomas versus all other sarcomas including GIST, transgelin emerged as the best diagnostic marker (Se: 83%, Sp: 82%, PPV: 67%, NPV: 92%, A: 83%), compared with smooth muscle actin (Se: 75%, Sp: 83, PPV: 66%, NPV: 89%, A: 81%), desmin (Se: 45%, Sp: 88%, PPV: 62%, NPV: 79%, A: 75%), h-caldesmon (Se: 50%, Sp: 90%, PPV: 67%, NPV: 81%, A: 78%) and calponin (Se: 76%, Sp: 70, PPV: 52%, NPV: 87%, A: 71%). In leiomyosarcomas compared with other specific tumor types such as undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma and myxofibrosarcoma, the accuracy for transgelin varied from 80 to 87% whereas it was lower for all other markers (between 51 and 80%). These results indicate that transgelin could be used in practice as an additional marker useful for decision making, especially in those tumors with incomplete immunophenotypes.
免疫组织化学使用肌源性标志物可用于确定软组织肿瘤中的平滑肌或骨骼肌分化。在某些情况下,确定恶性病变中的平滑肌分化可能具有挑战性。我们对从法国肉瘤组存档组织库中选择的 900 个软组织肿瘤进行了免疫组织化学检查,该库中包含大量平滑肌肉瘤。评估了四种最广泛使用的平滑肌诊断标志物(平滑肌肌动蛋白、结蛋白、h-钙调蛋白和钙调蛋白),并与一种新的标志物转谷氨酰胺酶进行了比较。统计评估了每种标志物在平滑肌肉瘤与包括胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)在内的所有其他肉瘤之间的敏感性(Se)、特异性(Sp)、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和准确性(A),以及在平滑肌肉瘤与特定肿瘤类型之间的特异性。在平滑肌肉瘤与包括 GIST 在内的所有其他肉瘤中,转谷氨酰胺酶是最佳诊断标志物(Se:83%,Sp:82%,PPV:67%,NPV:92%,A:83%),优于平滑肌肌动蛋白(Se:75%,Sp:83%,PPV:66%,NPV:89%,A:81%)、结蛋白(Se:45%,Sp:88%,PPV:62%,NPV:79%,A:75%)、h-钙调蛋白(Se:50%,Sp:90%,PPV:67%,NPV:81%,A:78%)和钙调蛋白(Se:76%,Sp:70%,PPV:52%,NPV:87%,A:71%)。在平滑肌肉瘤与其他特定肿瘤类型(如未分化多形性肉瘤和黏液纤维肉瘤)相比,转谷氨酰胺酶的准确性在 80%至 87%之间,而其他所有标志物的准确性均较低(51%至 80%)。这些结果表明,转谷氨酰胺酶在实践中可作为一种辅助决策有用的标志物,特别是在那些免疫表型不完全的肿瘤中。