Department of Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Ann Oncol. 2013 Apr;24(4):1087-93. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds587. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
We previously demonstrated that interruption of imatinib mesylate (IM) in responding patients (pts) with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) results in rapid reprogression. The impact of interruption on residual tumour, quality of response and secondary resistance has not been fully investigated.
Within the BRF14 study, 71 non-progressing patients were randomly assigned in the interruption arms after 1, 3 or 5 years. IM was resumed in the case of progressive disease (PD). Tumour status at randomisation, relapse and after IM rechallenge, progression-free survival (PFS) and time to secondary resistance were analysed.
At data cut-off, 51 of 71 patients had restarted IM following documented PD. Eighteen patients (35%) progressed on known lesions only, while 33 patients (65%) had new lesions, with concomitant progression of known lesions in 17 patients. Only 8 (42%) of complete remission (CR) patients and 12 (52%) of partial response (PR) patients at randomisation achieved a new CR and PR. Patients progressing rapidly after interruption had a poorer prognosis. Tumour status at randomisation influenced time to progression after rechallenge.
In advanced GIST patients interrupting IM, quality of response upon reintroduction did not reach the tumour status observed at randomisation. Rapid progression after imatinib interruption is associated with poor PFS after reintroduction.
我们之前的研究表明,对于接受伊马替尼治疗后病情进展的晚期胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)患者,中断伊马替尼治疗会导致肿瘤快速复发。目前尚未充分研究中断治疗对残留肿瘤、缓解质量和继发耐药的影响。
BRF14 研究中,71 例无进展患者在治疗 1、3 或 5 年后随机进入中断组。疾病进展时恢复伊马替尼治疗。分析随机化时、复发时和伊马替尼再挑战后的肿瘤状态、无进展生存期(PFS)和继发耐药时间。
截止数据分析时,71 例患者中有 51 例在记录到疾病进展后重新开始伊马替尼治疗。18 例(35%)仅在已知病灶进展,33 例(65%)出现新病灶,同时 17 例患者的已知病灶进展。只有 8 例(42%)随机时达到完全缓解(CR)的患者和 12 例(52%)部分缓解(PR)的患者达到新的 CR 和 PR。中断后快速进展的患者预后较差。再挑战时的肿瘤状态影响再次进展的时间。
在晚期 GIST 患者中断伊马替尼治疗后,再次引入时的缓解质量未达到随机时的肿瘤状态。伊马替尼中断后快速进展与再引入后的 PFS 较差相关。