Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Nov;14(12):1175-82. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70453-4. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
Few treatment options remain for patients with metastatic or unresectable gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) after objective progression on approved tyrosine-kinase inhibitors. We aimed to assess efficacy of imatinib rechallenge in these patients.
In our prospective, randomised, double-blind trial, we enrolled adults (≥18 years) who had previously benefited from first-line imatinib (initial response or stable disease for ≥6 months) but whose metastatic or unresectable GIST had progressed on at least imatinib and sunitinib. We randomly allocated participants in a 1:1 ratio, with a centralised computer-generated allocation procedure (random permuted blocks of two, four, and six) and stratified by previous treatment and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, to receive best supportive care with imatinib 400 mg per day or matched placebo. Crossover to open-label imatinib was allowed after investigator-adjudicated disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), as determined by a masked external radiological review. All analyses were done for all patients who received at least one dose of study drug.
Between July 20, 2010, and Jan 17, 2013, we randomly allocated 41 patients to the imatinib group and 40 patients to the placebo group. After a median follow-up of 5·2 months (IQR 3·4-9·4), median PFS was 1·8 months (95% CI 1·7-3·6) with imatinib compared with 0·9 months (0·9-1·7) with placebo (hazard ratio for progression or death 0·46, 95% CI 0·27-0·78; p=0·005). 37 (93%) patients in the placebo group crossed over to open-label imatinib after progression. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were anaemia (12 [29%] of 41 patients in the imatinib group vs three [8%] of 40 in the placebo group), fatigue (four [10%] vs none), and hyperbilirubinaemia (three [7%] vs one [3%]).
In patients with GIST that is refractory to treatment with all standard tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, the disease continues to harbour many clones that are sensitive to kinase inhibitors. Continued kinase suppression might slow, although not halt, disease progression.
在已批准的酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗后出现客观进展的转移性或不可切除胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)患者中,几乎没有其他治疗选择。我们旨在评估伊马替尼再挑战在这些患者中的疗效。
在我们的前瞻性、随机、双盲试验中,我们招募了先前从一线伊马替尼治疗中获益(初始反应或稳定疾病≥6 个月)但转移性或不可切除 GIST 至少在伊马替尼和舒尼替尼治疗后进展的成年患者(≥18 岁)。我们以 1:1 的比例随机分配参与者,采用中央计算机生成的分配程序(随机排列的两组、四组和六组),并按先前的治疗和东部合作肿瘤学组表现状态分层,接受每天 400mg 伊马替尼的最佳支持治疗或匹配的安慰剂。在研究者判定疾病进展后,允许交叉到开放标签伊马替尼。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS),由盲法外部放射学审查确定。所有分析均针对至少接受一剂研究药物的所有患者进行。
在 2010 年 7 月 20 日至 2013 年 1 月 17 日之间,我们将 41 名患者随机分配至伊马替尼组,40 名患者分配至安慰剂组。中位随访 5.2 个月(IQR 3.4-9.4)后,与安慰剂相比,伊马替尼的中位 PFS 为 1.8 个月(95%CI 1.7-3.6),而安慰剂为 0.9 个月(0.9-1.7)(进展或死亡的风险比为 0.46,95%CI 0.27-0.78;p=0.005)。安慰剂组的 37 名(93%)患者在进展后交叉至开放标签伊马替尼。最常见的 3 级或更高级别的不良事件为贫血(伊马替尼组 41 名患者中有 12 名[29%],安慰剂组 40 名患者中有 3 名[8%])、疲劳(伊马替尼组 4 名[10%],安慰剂组无)和高胆红素血症(伊马替尼组 3 名[7%],安慰剂组 1 名[3%])。
在对所有标准酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗均耐药的 GIST 患者中,疾病继续存在许多对激酶抑制剂敏感的克隆。持续的激酶抑制可能会减缓(尽管不能阻止)疾病进展。