Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
J Voice. 2012 Nov;26(6):818.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.05.003.
Because voice quality depends substantially on vocal fold closure (VFC), voice therapists try to modify VFC by specific voice techniques or adjustments in phonation mode. This study demonstrates the impact of six different phonation modes on VFC in healthy subjects.
For this study, 21 female subjects with normal voice quality were selected. The impact of different phonation modes and voice techniques was examined by fiberoptic laryngovideoendoscopy during different modes of phonation: habitual phonation, high pitch, low pitch, resonance on /m/, Coblenzer's "abspannen," and chant talk. The video recordings were judged by three experienced professionals (two Speech and Language Pathologist and one laryngologist) by means of a visual analog scale.
Statistical analysis showed that only resonance on /m/ significantly improved VFC compared with habitual phonation. All other phonation modes and techniques, except low-pitched phonation, led to a significant worse closure in comparison with the closure at normal pitch. The glottic closure observed by low-pitched phonation was not significantly different than the closure at habitual pitch. Interrater agreement was moderate to very good, depending on the mode of phonation.
The results of this study allow a better understanding of the impact of phonation mode and vocal therapy techniques on VFC in healthy subjects and give an indication about the impact of these methods to influence VFC.
由于音质在很大程度上取决于声带闭合(VFC),因此语音治疗师试图通过特定的语音技术或发声模式的调整来改变 VFC。本研究旨在展示六种不同发声模式对健康受试者 VFC 的影响。
本研究选择了 21 名具有正常音质的女性受试者。通过纤维喉镜视频内窥镜,在不同的发声模式下(习惯性发声、高音、低音、/m/共振、Coblenzer 的“abspannen”和吟唱)检查不同发声模式和语音技术的影响。视频记录由三位经验丰富的专业人士(两位言语语言病理学家和一位喉科医生)通过视觉模拟量表进行评估。
统计分析表明,仅/m/共振与习惯性发声相比,能显著改善 VFC。除了低音发声外,所有其他发声模式和技术都导致了明显比正常音高时更差的闭合。与正常音高时的闭合相比,低音发声时观察到的声门闭合没有显著差异。取决于发声模式,组内相关系数为中等至非常好。
本研究的结果可以更好地理解发声模式和语音治疗技术对健康受试者 VFC 的影响,并说明这些方法对影响 VFC 的作用。