• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

切除与消融治疗肝细胞癌的比较:基于日本全国性调查的队列研究。

Comparison of resection and ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a cohort study based on a Japanese nationwide survey.

机构信息

Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Hepatol. 2013 Apr;58(4):724-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.11.009. Epub 2012 Nov 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhep.2012.11.009
PMID:23178708
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The treatment of choice for early or moderately advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with good liver function remains controversial. We evaluated the therapeutic impacts of surgical resection (SR), percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) on long-term outcomes in patients with HCC.

METHODS

A database constructed on the basis of a Japanese nationwide survey of 28,510 patients with HCC treated by SR, PEI, or RFA between 2000 and 2005 was used to identify 12,968 patients who had no more than 3 tumors (≤ 3 cm) and liver damage of class A or B. The patients were divided into SR (n=5361), RFA (n=5548), and PEI groups (n=2059). Overall survival and time to recurrence were compared among them.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 2.16 years. Overall survival at 3 and 5 years was respectively 85.3%/71.1% in the SR group, 81.0%/61.1% in the RFA, and 78.9%/56.3% in the PEI. Time to recurrence at 3 and 5 years was 43.3%/63.8%, 57.2%/71.7%, and 64.3%/76.9%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, the hazard ratio for death was significantly lower in the SR group than in the RFA (SR vs. RFA:0.84, 95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.95; p=0.006) and PEI groups (SR vs. PEI:0.75, 0.64-0.86; p=0.0001). The hazard ratios for recurrence were also lower in the SR group than in the RFA (SR vs. RFA:0.74, 0.68-0.79; p=0.0001) and PEI groups (SR vs. PEI:0.59, 0.54-0.65; p=0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that surgical resection results in longer overall survival and time to recurrence than either RFA or PEIin patients with HCC [corrected].

摘要

背景与目的

对于肝功能良好的早期或中期进展性肝细胞癌(HCC),其首选治疗方法仍存在争议。我们评估了手术切除(SR)、经皮乙醇注射(PEI)和射频消融(RFA)对 HCC 患者长期预后的治疗影响。

方法

利用基于 2000 年至 2005 年期间接受 SR、PEI 或 RFA 治疗的 28510 例 HCC 患者的日本全国性调查建立的数据库,确定了 12968 例无 3 个以上肿瘤(≤3cm)且肝功能为 A 级或 B 级的患者。将患者分为 SR(n=5361)、RFA(n=5548)和 PEI 组(n=2059)。比较它们之间的总生存时间和复发时间。

结果

中位随访时间为 2.16 年。SR 组的 3 年和 5 年总生存率分别为 85.3%/71.1%,RFA 组分别为 81.0%/61.1%,PEI 组分别为 78.9%/56.3%。3 年和 5 年的复发时间分别为 43.3%/63.8%、57.2%/71.7%和 64.3%/76.9%。多变量分析显示,SR 组的死亡风险显著低于 RFA 组(SR 与 RFA:0.84,95%置信区间,0.74-0.95;p=0.006)和 PEI 组(SR 与 PEI:0.75,0.64-0.86;p=0.0001)。SR 组的复发风险也低于 RFA 组(SR 与 RFA:0.74,0.68-0.79;p=0.0001)和 PEI 组(SR 与 PEI:0.59,0.54-0.65;p=0.0001)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,与 RFA 或 PEI 相比,手术切除可使 HCC 患者获得更长的总生存时间和复发时间[已纠正]。

相似文献

1
Comparison of resection and ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a cohort study based on a Japanese nationwide survey.切除与消融治疗肝细胞癌的比较:基于日本全国性调查的队列研究。
J Hepatol. 2013 Apr;58(4):724-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.11.009. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
2
Surgical resection vs. percutaneous ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a preliminary report of the Japanese nationwide survey.肝细胞癌的手术切除与经皮消融治疗:日本全国性调查的初步报告
J Hepatol. 2008 Oct;49(4):589-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.05.018. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
3
Hepatocellular carcinoma treated with radiofrequency ablation with or without ethanol injection: a prospective randomized trial.射频消融联合或不联合乙醇注射治疗肝细胞癌:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Radiology. 2007 Aug;244(2):599-607. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2442060826.
4
Radiofrequency ablation versus resection for the treatment of early stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter Australian study.射频消融与手术切除治疗早期肝细胞癌:一项澳大利亚多中心研究
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015 May;50(5):567-76. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2014.953572. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
5
[Randomized clinical trial of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation plus absolute ethanol injection compared with radiofrequency ablation alone for small hepatocellular carcinoma].经皮射频消融联合无水乙醇注射与单纯射频消融治疗小肝癌的随机临床试验
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2005 Oct;27(10):623-5.
6
Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation as first-line treatment for small hepatocellular carcinoma: results and prognostic factors on long-term follow up.经皮射频消融作为小肝癌的一线治疗:长期随访结果和预后因素。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Mar;25(3):597-604. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06125.x. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
7
Impact of resection and ablation for single hypovascular hepatocellular carcinoma ≤2 cm analysed with propensity score weighting.采用倾向评分加权分析单发<2cm 乏血管性肝细胞癌切除术与消融术的影响。
Liver Int. 2018 Mar;38(3):484-493. doi: 10.1111/liv.13670. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
8
Survival advantage of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with ethanol injection.肝细胞癌射频消融术的生存优势:与乙醇注射的比较。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2013 Sep;60(126):1399-404. doi: 10.5754/hge121270.
9
Negative hepatitis B envelope antigen predicts intrahepatic recurrence in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after ablation therapy.乙型肝炎包膜抗原阴性预测乙型肝炎病毒相关肝细胞癌消融治疗后肝内复发。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Nov;26(11):1638-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06777.x.
10
Percutaneous ablation procedures in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma submitted to liver transplantation: Assessment of efficacy at explant analysis and of safety for tumor recurrence.接受肝移植的肝硬化肝细胞癌患者的经皮消融治疗:移植肝分析时疗效及肿瘤复发安全性评估
Liver Transpl. 2005 Sep;11(9):1117-26. doi: 10.1002/lt.20469.

引用本文的文献

1
Response to: comment on "Stage-specific impact of portal hypertension on outcomes after liver resection in hepatocellular carcinoma".对《门静脉高压对肝细胞癌肝切除术后预后的分期特异性影响》评论的回应
Hepatol Int. 2025 Aug 30. doi: 10.1007/s12072-025-10900-9.
2
MAGI2-AS3/miR-450b-5p/COLEC10 interaction network: A potential therapeutic and prognostic marker in hepatocellular carcinoma.MAGI2-AS3/miR-450b-5p/COLEC10相互作用网络:肝细胞癌潜在的治疗和预后标志物
ILIVER. 2025 Feb 13;4(1):100146. doi: 10.1016/j.iliver.2025.100146. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Interpretable and generalizable deep learning model for preoperative assessment of microvascular invasion and outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma based on MRI: a multicenter study.
基于MRI的可解释且可推广的深度学习模型用于肝细胞癌微血管侵犯及预后的术前评估:一项多中心研究
Insights Imaging. 2025 Jul 3;16(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13244-025-02035-0.
4
Clinical significance of contrast extravasation on computed tomography immediately after thermal ablation for hepatic tumors.肝脏肿瘤热消融术后立即行计算机断层扫描时对比剂外渗的临床意义
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-04025-4.
5
TCR-based cellular immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: advances, challenges, and prospects.基于TCR的肝细胞癌细胞免疫疗法:进展、挑战与前景
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2025 Jul 1;74(8):257. doi: 10.1007/s00262-025-04122-z.
6
Lymphocyte-C-Reactive Protein Ratio: Impact on Prognosis of Patients Following Resection of Primary Liver Cancer.淋巴细胞与C反应蛋白比值:对原发性肝癌切除术后患者预后的影响
World J Surg. 2025 Aug;49(8):2195-2206. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12675. Epub 2025 Jun 17.
7
Comparison of carbon ion radiotherapy and transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable solitary hepatocellular carcinoma >3 cm: a propensity score-matched analysis.碳离子放疗与经动脉化疗栓塞治疗直径>3cm不可切除的孤立性肝细胞癌的比较:一项倾向评分匹配分析
J Radiat Res. 2025 May 23;66(3):306-317. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rraf026.
8
Multimodal sequencing of neoadjuvant nivolumab treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma reveals cellular and molecular immune landscape for drug response.肝细胞癌新辅助纳武利尤单抗治疗的多模态测序揭示了药物反应的细胞和分子免疫格局。
Mol Cancer. 2025 Apr 9;24(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12943-025-02314-w.
9
COPB2 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression through regulation of YAP1 nuclear translocation.COPB2通过调控YAP1核转位促进肝细胞癌进展。
Oncol Res. 2025 Mar 19;33(4):975-988. doi: 10.32604/or.2025.058085. eCollection 2025.
10
Radiofrequency ablation for peribiliary hepatocellular carcinoma: propensity score matching analysis.肝门周围肝细胞癌的射频消融:倾向评分匹配分析
Insights Imaging. 2025 Feb 19;16(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13244-025-01919-5.