Van Bennekom Carla M, Mitchell Allen A, Moore Cynthia A, Werler Martha M
Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2013 Jan;97(1):53-9. doi: 10.1002/bdra.23101. Epub 2012 Nov 24.
Little is known about the etiology of nonsyndromic microtia. This study investigated the hypothesis that microtia is caused by vascular disruption.
The study analyzed data from the population-based National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS) for deliveries between 1997 and 2005. Four hundred eleven nonsyndromic cases of microtia, with or without additional defects, were compared to 6560 nonmalformed infants with respect to maternal exposures to vasoactive medications and smoking during the periconceptional period and conditions that have previously been associated with vascular events (multiple gestation, maternal history of type 1, type 2, or gestational diabetes, and hypertension). Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated with multivariable models, controlling for the effects of race/ethnicity, education, periconceptional folic acid use, and study center.
Risk estimates for vasoactive medications and smoking were not meaningfully increased. Maternal type 1/2 diabetes was diagnosed before or during the index pregnancy in 4% and 1% of cases, respectively, compared to 1% and 0.05% of controls; the adjusted OR for these two groups combined was 7.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.9-13.1). Gestational diabetes was observed for 9% of cases and 6% of controls; the OR was moderately elevated (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.9-2.0). ORs were also increased for multiple gestations (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.5-4.2) and pre-existing hypertension (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.0-2.5).
Because ORs were only elevated for diabetes and not for vasoactive exposures or other potential vascular events, findings suggest that some microtia occurrences may be part of the diabetic embryopathy rather than manifestations of vascular disruption. Birth Defects Research (Part A), 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
关于非综合征性小耳畸形的病因知之甚少。本研究调查了小耳畸形由血管破坏引起这一假说。
该研究分析了基于人群的国家出生缺陷预防研究(NBDPS)中1997年至2005年分娩的数据。将411例有或无其他缺陷的非综合征性小耳畸形病例与6560例无畸形婴儿在孕期接触血管活性药物、吸烟情况以及先前与血管事件相关的情况(多胎妊娠、母亲1型、2型或妊娠期糖尿病史和高血压)方面进行了比较。采用多变量模型估计比值比(OR),并控制种族/民族、教育程度、孕期叶酸使用情况和研究中心的影响。
血管活性药物和吸烟的风险估计值没有显著增加。分别有4%和1%的病例在本次妊娠前或妊娠期间被诊断为母亲1型/2型糖尿病,而对照组分别为1%和0.05%;这两组合并后的调整OR为7.2(95%置信区间[CI],3.9 - 13.1)。9%的病例和6%的对照组观察到妊娠期糖尿病;OR中度升高(OR,1.4;95% CI,0.9 - 2.0)。多胎妊娠(OR,2.5;95% CI,1.5 - 4.2)和既往高血压(OR,1.6;95% CI,1.0 - 2.5)的OR也有所增加。
由于仅糖尿病的OR升高,而血管活性暴露或其他潜在血管事件的OR未升高,研究结果表明,一些小耳畸形的发生可能是糖尿病胚胎病的一部分,而非血管破坏的表现。《出生缺陷研究(A部分)》,2013年。© 2012威利期刊公司。