Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Saint-Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, INSERM U940, Paris, France.
Lancet. 2013 Jan 26;381(9863):313-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61265-3. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
Rejection of allografts has always been the major obstacle to transplantation success. We aimed to improve characterisation of different kidney-allograft rejection phenotypes, identify how each one is associated with anti-HLA antibodies, and investigate their distinct prognoses.
Patients who underwent ABO-compatible kidney transplantations in Necker Hospital and Saint-Louis Hospital (Paris, France) between Jan 1, 1998, and Dec 31, 2008, were included in our population-based study. We assessed patients who provided biopsy samples for acute allograft rejection, which was defined as the association of deterioration in function and histopathological lesions. The main outcome was kidney allograft loss-ie, return to dialysis. To investigate distinct rejection patterns, we retrospectively assessed rejection episodes with review of graft histology, C4d in allograft biopsies, and donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies.
2079 patients were included in the main analyses, of whom 302 (15%) had acute biopsy-proven rejection. We identified four distinct patterns of kidney allograft rejection: T cell-mediated vascular rejection (26 patients [9%]), antibody-mediated vascular rejection (64 [21%]), T cell-mediated rejection without vasculitis (139 [46%]), and antibody-mediated rejection without vasculitis (73 [24%]). Risk of graft loss was 9·07 times (95 CI 3·62-19·7) higher in antibody-mediated vascular rejection than in T cell-mediated rejection without vasculitis (p<0·0001), compared with an increase of 2·93 times (1·1-7·9; P=0·0237) in antibody-mediated rejection without vasculitis and no significant rise in T cell-mediated vascular rejection (hazard ratio [HR] 1·5, 95% CI 0·33-7·6; p=0·60).
We have identified a type of kidney rejection not presently included in classifications: antibody-mediated vascular rejection. Recognition of this distinct phenotype could lead to the development of new treatment strategies that could salvage many kidney allografts.
None.
同种异体移植物的排斥一直是移植成功的主要障碍。我们旨在改善对不同肾移植排斥表型的描述,确定每种表型与抗 HLA 抗体的关系,并研究它们不同的预后。
本研究纳入了 1998 年 1 月 1 日至 2008 年 12 月 31 日期间在 Necker 医院和 Saint-Louis 医院(法国巴黎)接受 ABO 相容肾移植的患者。我们评估了提供急性移植物排斥活检样本的患者,将其定义为功能恶化和组织病理学病变的联合表现。主要结局是肾移植丧失,即恢复透析。为了研究不同的排斥模式,我们回顾性评估了排斥发作的病例,包括移植组织学、移植活检中的 C4d 和供体特异性抗 HLA 抗体。
在主要分析中,共纳入 2079 例患者,其中 302 例(15%)经急性活检证实为排斥反应。我们确定了四种不同的肾移植排斥模式:T 细胞介导的血管排斥(26 例[9%])、抗体介导的血管排斥(64 例[21%])、无脉管炎的 T 细胞介导排斥(139 例[46%])和无脉管炎的抗体介导排斥(73 例[24%])。与无脉管炎的 T 细胞介导排斥相比,抗体介导的血管排斥的移植物丢失风险高 9.07 倍(95%CI 3.62-19.7,p<0.0001),而无脉管炎的抗体介导排斥的风险增加 2.93 倍(1.1-7.9;P=0.0237),T 细胞介导的血管排斥无显著增加(风险比[HR] 1.5,95%CI 0.33-7.6;p=0.60)。
我们已经确定了一种目前未被分类所包含的肾排斥类型:抗体介导的血管排斥。识别这种独特的表型可能会导致新的治疗策略的发展,从而挽救许多肾移植。
无。