Suppr超能文献

[左心室功能不全患者冠状动脉旁路移植术的结果(非体外循环与体外循环的比较)]

[Results of coronary artery bypass grafting with left ventricular dysfunction (comparison of off-pump versus on-pump)].

作者信息

Ait Houssa M, Moutakiallah Y, Abdou A, Selkane C, Amahzoune B, Drissi M, Raissouni M, El Bekkali Y, Azendour H, Boulahya A

机构信息

Service de chirurgie cardiovasculaire, hôpital militaire d'instruction Mohamed V, BP 10100, Rabat, Maroc.

出版信息

Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2013 Aug;62(4):241-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ancard.2012.09.017. Epub 2012 Oct 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the results of myocardial revascularisation with or without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with impaired left ventricular function.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Five hundred and sixteen consecutive patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting from January 2000 through December 2007 were analyzed retrospectively. One hundred and eight cases had a left ventricular EF (ejection fraction) of 45% or less. Of these patients, 78 underwent conventional coronary artery bypass (CCABG) and 30 underwent off-pump procedure (OCABG). The CCABG group received 300IU/kg of heparin while the OCABG received 100IU/kg. The off-pump coronary surgery was carried out using a tissue stabilizer Octopus II. Different pre-, per- and postoperative variables were evaluated among both groups. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 11.5. The variables were compared between these two groups using univariate analysis (Chi(2) test, Fisher's test exact) for qualitative variable and (Student's t test, Mann-Whitney's test) for quantitative variable.

RESULTS

Patients profiles and risk factors were similar among both groups except for age (CCABG: 57.8±9.2 year vs OCABG: 52±9.9 year; P=0.004) and left ventricular EF (CCABG: 37.4±6.3% vs OCABG: 34±7.8%; P=0.02). The number of grafts performed per patient was significantly more among patients who underwent extracorporeal circulation (CCABG: 2.53±0.7 graft/patient vs OCABG: 1.77±0.8 graft/patient; P<0.0001). The hospital mortality was more among CCABG group 9% vs 3.3% in OCABG but the difference was not significant (P=0.3). However, the operative time and the operative room stay were long in CCABG (252±61min vs 175±38min; P<0.0001 - 389±70min vs 298±54min; P<0.0001). The ventilation time was also long in CCABG (32.3±67hour vs 10.4±5.9hour; P=0.15). There was more postoperative myocardial infarction in CCABG (P=0.008), but the EF increased and was better in CCABG.

CONCLUSION

Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery provides satisfactory operative results for most patients with reduced left ventricular function. Prospective and randomly study will be necessary before concluding.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是比较左心室功能受损患者在有或没有体外循环情况下进行心肌血运重建的结果。

患者与方法

回顾性分析了2000年1月至2007年12月连续接受冠状动脉搭桥术的516例患者。108例患者的左心室射血分数(EF)为45%或更低。在这些患者中,78例接受了传统冠状动脉搭桥术(CCABG),30例接受了非体外循环手术(OCABG)。CCABG组接受300IU/kg肝素,而OCABG组接受100IU/kg。非体外循环冠状动脉手术使用组织稳定器Octopus II进行。评估两组患者术前、术中和术后的不同变量。使用SPSS 11.5进行统计分析。使用单因素分析(卡方检验、Fisher精确检验)对定性变量进行两组间变量比较,使用(学生t检验、曼-惠特尼检验)对定量变量进行比较。

结果

除年龄(CCABG组:57.8±9.2岁 vs OCABG组:52±9.9岁;P = 0.004)和左心室EF(CCABG组:37.4±6.3% vs OCABG组:34±7.8%;P = 0.02)外,两组患者的概况和危险因素相似。接受体外循环的患者每人进行的移植血管数量明显更多(CCABG组:2.53±0.7根移植血管/患者 vs OCABG组:1.77±0.8根移植血管/患者;P < 0.0001)。CCABG组的医院死亡率更高,为9%,而OCABG组为3.3%,但差异不显著(P = 0.3)。然而,CCABG组的手术时间和手术室停留时间更长(252±61分钟 vs 175±38分钟;P < 0.0001 - 389±70分钟 vs 298±54分钟;P < 0.0001)。CCABG组的通气时间也更长(32.3±67小时 vs 10.4±5.9小时;P = 0.15)。CCABG组术后心肌梗死更多(P = 0.008),但CCABG组的EF增加且更好。

结论

非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术为大多数左心室功能降低的患者提供了满意的手术结果。在得出结论之前,有必要进行前瞻性随机研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验