Chen Xin, Xu Ming, Shi Hong-wei, Mu Xin-wei, Chen Zhen-qiang, Qiu Zhi-bing
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Heart Institute, Nanjing 210006, China.
Chin Med J (Engl). 2004 Mar;117(3):342-6.
Studies on selected patients undergoing off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery have produced inconsistent results, especially in patients with multiple coronary artery disease. This study compared the clinical results of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in patients with triple-vessel disease.
A total of 300 consecutive isolated, multiple coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients were assigned to the off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB, n = 150) or CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass (CCABG, n = 150) groups. There were no significant differences regarding degree of angina, history of myocardial infarction or diabetes, and presence of left main coronary artery disease between the two groups. Ejection fraction in the OPCAB group before surgery was lower than in the CCABG group (P < 0.01). In addition, more patients had a history of stroke and abnormal renal function preoperatively in the OPCAB group (P < 0.01). In OPCAB patients, single deep pericardial stay suture with a sling snared down was used to expose the target vessels, along with a stabilizer and a coronary shunt. A Medi-Stim Butterfly Flowmeter was used to measure blood flow through grafts in both groups.
No OPCAB patient was converted to the CCABG group. The average numbers of distal anastomoses and the indexes of completeness of revascularization (ICR) were similar in both groups. Postoperative respiratory support time and the volumes of chest tube drainage and of blood transfusions were less in the OPCAB group than in the CCABG group (both P < 0.01). The postoperative incidences of pulmonary dysfunction and renal insufficiency were lower in the OPCAB group than in the CCABG group (both P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in mortality and other causes of morbidity (perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, atrial fibrillation).
OPCAB can be applied to patients with triple-vessel coronary artery disease and can achieve similar completeness of revascularization and similar early surgical results, with shorter respiratory support, reduced transfusion requirement, and fewer cases of pulmonary dysfunction and abnormal renal function.
关于接受非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术的特定患者的研究结果并不一致,尤其是在患有多支冠状动脉疾病的患者中。本研究比较了三支血管病变患者接受体外循环和非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术的临床结果。
总共300例连续接受孤立性、多支冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)的患者被分为非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术(OPCAB,n = 150)组或体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术(CCABG,n = 150)组。两组在心绞痛程度、心肌梗死或糖尿病病史以及左主干冠状动脉疾病的存在方面无显著差异。OPCAB组术前射血分数低于CCABG组(P < 0.01)。此外,OPCAB组术前有中风病史和肾功能异常的患者更多(P < 0.01)。对于OPCAB患者,采用单根深部心包留置缝线并向下圈套吊带以暴露目标血管,同时使用稳定器和冠状动脉分流器。两组均使用Medi-Stim Butterfly血流仪测量移植血管的血流量。
没有OPCAB患者转为CCABG组。两组的远端吻合平均数量和血管重建完成指数(ICR)相似。OPCAB组术后呼吸支持时间、胸管引流量和输血量均少于CCABG组(均P < 0.01)。OPCAB组术后肺功能障碍和肾功能不全的发生率低于CCABG组(均P < 0.05)。两组在死亡率和其他发病原因(围手术期心肌梗死、中风、心房颤动)方面无显著差异。
OPCAB可应用于三支血管冠状动脉疾病患者,可实现相似的血管重建完成度和相似的早期手术结果,呼吸支持时间更短,输血需求减少,肺功能障碍和肾功能异常病例更少。