Suppr超能文献

超声引导下星状神经节阻滞对伴有复杂性区域疼痛综合征的中风患者的疗效

Efficacy of ultrasonography guided stellate ganglion blockade in the stroke patients with complex regional pain syndrome.

作者信息

Yoo Seung Don, Jung Sang Soo, Kim Hee-Sang, Yun Dong Hwan, Kim Dong Hwan, Chon Jinmann, Hong Dong Whan

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kyung Hee University College Medicine, Seoul 130-702, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Rehabil Med. 2012 Oct;36(5):633-9. doi: 10.5535/arm.2012.36.5.633. Epub 2012 Oct 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of ultrasonography guided stellate ganglion block (US-SGB) with that of blind SGB in management of the stroke patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type 1.

METHOD

Forty-two patients with post-stroke CRPS were randomly assigned to either US-guided SGB (22 patients) or blind SGB group (20 patients). The mean age of US-guided SGB and blind SGB groups was 61.3±5.6 years and 59.1±4.5 years. We performed two blockades at 7-day intervals on the affected side of patients with CRPS. Pain intensity, using a visual analog score (VAS), score of CRPS clinical severity, and the amounts of affected hand swelling with a hand volumeter were assessed before, 2 weeks and 4 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

In both groups, VAS and the amount of hand swelling were significantly decreased after 2 weeks and after 4 weeks. Between two groups, VAS difference of US-guided SGB group and that of blind SGB group were 2.61±1.09, 1.88±0.62 at 2 weeks and 3.67±1.03, 3.13±0.62 at 4 weeks, respectively. US-guided SGB group showed more significant improvement in mean change of VAS compared to the blind SGB group (p-value<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both US-guided SGB and blind SGB techniques were effective in relieving pain in subacute stroke patients with CRPS. US-guided SGB was better in pain relief but has no advantages in reduction of hand swelling in this study.

摘要

目的

比较超声引导下星状神经节阻滞(US-SGB)与盲法星状神经节阻滞在治疗1型复杂性区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)中风患者中的疗效。

方法

42例中风后CRPS患者被随机分为超声引导下星状神经节阻滞组(22例)和盲法星状神经节阻滞组(20例)。超声引导下星状神经节阻滞组和盲法星状神经节阻滞组的平均年龄分别为61.3±5.6岁和59.1±4.5岁。我们对CRPS患者的患侧每隔7天进行两次阻滞。在治疗前、治疗后2周和4周评估疼痛强度(采用视觉模拟评分法[VAS])、CRPS临床严重程度评分以及用手部体积计测量的患手肿胀程度。

结果

两组患者在治疗后2周和4周时,VAS评分和手部肿胀程度均显著降低。两组之间,超声引导下星状神经节阻滞组与盲法星状神经节阻滞组的VAS差异在2周时分别为2.61±1.09和1.88±0.62,在4周时分别为3.67±1.03和3.13±0.62。与盲法星状神经节阻滞组相比,超声引导下星状神经节阻滞组在VAS平均变化方面改善更显著(p值<0.05)。

结论

超声引导下星状神经节阻滞和盲法星状神经节阻滞技术在缓解亚急性中风合并CRPS患者的疼痛方面均有效。在本研究中,超声引导下星状神经节阻滞在缓解疼痛方面效果更好,但在减轻手部肿胀方面无优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c4b/3503938/e980f6ff6f16/arm-36-633-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验