• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复杂性区域疼痛综合征严重程度评分的制定。

Development of a severity score for CRPS.

机构信息

Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Trauma Related Neuronal Dysfunction Consortium (TREND), The Netherlands University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA Reuth Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Pain. 2010 Dec;151(3):870-876. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.031. Epub 2010 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.031
PMID:20965657
Abstract

The clinical diagnosis of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) is a dichotomous (yes/no) categorization necessary for clinical decision-making. However, such dichotomous diagnostic categories do not convey an individual's subtle and temporal gradations in severity of the condition, and have poor statistical power when used as an outcome measure in research. This study evaluated the validity and potential utility of a continuous type score to index severity of CRPS. Psychometric and medical evaluations were conducted in 114 CRPS patients and 41 non-CRPS neuropathic pain patients. Based on the presence/absence of 17 clinically-assessed signs and symptoms of CRPS, an overall CRPS Severity Score (CSS) was derived. The CSS discriminated well between CRPS and non-CRPS patients (p<.001), and displayed strong associations with dichotomous CRPS diagnoses using both IASP diagnostic criteria (Eta=0.69) and proposed revised criteria (Eta=0.77-0.88). Higher CSS was associated with significantly higher clinical pain intensity, distress, and functional impairments, as well as greater bilateral temperature asymmetry and thermal perception abnormalities (p's<.05). In an archival prospective dataset, increases in anxiety and depression from pre-surgical baseline to 4 weeks post-knee arthroplasty were found to predict significantly higher CSS at 6- and 12-month follow-up (p's<.05). Results indicate the CSS corresponds with and complements currently accepted dichotomous diagnostic criteria for CRPS, and support its validity as an index of CRPS severity. Its utility as an outcome measure in research studies is also suggested, with potential statistical advantages over dichotomous diagnostic criteria.

摘要

复杂性区域疼痛综合征 (CRPS) 的临床诊断是一种必要的二分法(是/否)分类,用于临床决策。然而,这种二分法诊断类别并不能传达个体病情严重程度的微妙和时间上的渐变,并且在作为研究中的结果测量时统计效力较差。本研究评估了一种连续型评分来评估 CRPS 严重程度的有效性和潜在效用。在 114 名 CRPS 患者和 41 名非 CRPS 神经性疼痛患者中进行了心理测量学和医学评估。基于 CRPS 的 17 种临床评估体征和症状的存在/不存在,得出了总体 CRPS 严重程度评分(CSS)。CSS 很好地区分了 CRPS 和非 CRPS 患者(p<.001),并且与使用 IASP 诊断标准(Eta=0.69)和拟议修订标准(Eta=0.77-0.88)的二分法 CRPS 诊断具有很强的关联。较高的 CSS 与显著更高的临床疼痛强度、痛苦和功能障碍相关,以及更大的双侧温度不对称和热知觉异常(p<.05)。在一个档案前瞻性数据集,从术前基线到膝关节置换术后 4 周的焦虑和抑郁增加被发现显著预测了 6 个月和 12 个月随访时的 CSS 更高(p<.05)。结果表明 CSS 与目前接受的 CRPS 二分法诊断标准相对应并补充了这些标准,并支持其作为 CRPS 严重程度的指标的有效性。还建议将其用作研究中的结果测量,与二分法诊断标准相比具有潜在的统计学优势。

相似文献

1
Development of a severity score for CRPS.复杂性区域疼痛综合征严重程度评分的制定。
Pain. 2010 Dec;151(3):870-876. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.031. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
2
A prospective, multisite, international validation of the Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Severity Score.前瞻性、多中心、国际复杂区域疼痛综合征严重程度评分验证。
Pain. 2017 Aug;158(8):1430-1436. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000927.
3
Preoperative Predictors of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Outcomes in the 6 Months Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后 6 个月内复杂性区域疼痛综合征结局的术前预测因素。
J Pain. 2022 Oct;23(10):1712-1723. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.04.005. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
4
Complex regional pain syndrome: are the IASP diagnostic criteria valid and sufficiently comprehensive?复杂性区域疼痛综合征:国际疼痛研究协会的诊断标准是否有效且足够全面?
Pain. 1999 Nov;83(2):211-9. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00104-9.
5
Prospective examination of pain-related and psychological predictors of CRPS-like phenomena following total knee arthroplasty: a preliminary study.全膝关节置换术后复杂性区域疼痛综合征样现象的疼痛相关及心理预测因素的前瞻性研究:一项初步研究
Pain. 2003 Dec;106(3):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.08.009.
6
Validation of proposed diagnostic criteria (the "Budapest Criteria") for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome.验证复杂区域疼痛综合征的拟议诊断标准(“布达佩斯标准”)。
Pain. 2010 Aug;150(2):268-274. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.030. Epub 2010 May 20.
7
Do severity score and skin temperature asymmetry correlate with the subjective pain score in the patients with complex regional pain syndrome?严重程度评分和皮肤温度不对称与复杂性区域疼痛综合征患者的主观疼痛评分相关吗?
Korean J Pain. 2014 Oct;27(4):339-44. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2014.27.4.339. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
8
Neurological findings in complex regional pain syndromes--analysis of 145 cases.复杂性区域疼痛综合征的神经学表现——145例分析
Acta Neurol Scand. 2000 Apr;101(4):262-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2000.101004262x./.
9
External validation of IASP diagnostic criteria for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome and proposed research diagnostic criteria. International Association for the Study of Pain.国际疼痛研究协会制定的复杂性区域疼痛综合征的国际疼痛研究协会(IASP)诊断标准及拟议的研究诊断标准的外部验证。
Pain. 1999 May;81(1-2):147-54. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00011-1.
10
Outcome of the complex regional pain syndrome.复杂性区域疼痛综合征的结局
Clin J Pain. 2009 Sep;25(7):590-7. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181a11623.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic Criteria and Technical Evaluation of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Narrative Review.复杂性区域疼痛综合征的诊断标准与技术评估:一项叙述性综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Sep 8;15(17):2281. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15172281.
2
A Model of Body Perception Disturbances in Chronic Limb Pain: The Predictive Role of Kinesiophobia, Depersonalization and Symptom Severity.慢性肢体疼痛中身体感知障碍模型:运动恐惧、人格解体和症状严重程度的预测作用。
Eur J Pain. 2025 Oct;29(9):e70123. doi: 10.1002/ejp.70123.
3
The Effect of Fremanezumab on Pain in Patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: Study Protocol of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Proof-of-Concept, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
孚来美对复杂性区域疼痛综合征患者疼痛的影响:一项随机、双盲、概念验证、安慰剂对照试验的研究方案
Brain Sci. 2025 Apr 28;15(5):468. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15050468.
4
Perceived injustice and its relation to chronic pain outcome in complex regional pain syndrome and chronic musculoskeletal pain.复杂区域疼痛综合征和慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛中感知到的不公正及其与慢性疼痛结局的关系。
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 3;6:1554630. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1554630. eCollection 2025.
5
Dynamic risk factors for complex regional pain syndrome after distal radius fracture surgery: multivariate analysis and prediction.桡骨远端骨折手术后复杂性区域疼痛综合征的动态风险因素:多变量分析和预测。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Nov 12;25(1):899. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07948-3.
6
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: a cross-sectional study of physical symptoms, disability, and psychological health in long term.复杂性区域疼痛综合征:一项关于长期身体症状、残疾和心理健康的横断面研究。
Pain Rep. 2024 Sep 20;9(5):e1180. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001180. eCollection 2024 Oct.
7
Monitoring Everyday Upper Extremity Function in Patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Secondary, Retrospective Analysis from ncRNAPain.监测复杂性区域疼痛综合征患者的日常上肢功能:ncRNAPain 的二次回顾性分析。
Pain Res Manag. 2024 Aug 24;2024:9993438. doi: 10.1155/2024/9993438. eCollection 2024.
8
Differential effects of everyday-life social support on chronic pain.日常生活社会支持对慢性疼痛的差异影响。
BMC Neurol. 2024 Aug 28;24(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03792-z.
9
Effect of an interdisciplinary inpatient program for patients with complex regional pain syndrome in reducing disease activity-a single-center prospective cohort study.复杂区域性疼痛综合征患者的跨学科住院治疗方案对降低疾病活动度的影响:一项单中心前瞻性队列研究。
Pain Med. 2024 Jul 1;25(7):459-467. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnae021.
10
Quantitative Dynamic Allodynograph-A Standardized Measure for Testing Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia in Chronic Limb Pain.定量动态触诱发痛计——一种用于测试慢性肢体疼痛中动态机械性触诱发痛的标准化测量方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Sep 18;23(18):7949. doi: 10.3390/s23187949.