Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith NSW 2751, Australia.
Ecology. 2012 Oct;93(10):2208-15. doi: 10.1890/11-2272.1.
Research investigating interactions between aboveground (AG) and below-ground (BG) herbivores has been central to characterizing AG-BG linkages in terrestrial ecosystems, with many of these interactions forming the basis of complex food webs spanning the two subsystems. Despite the growing literature on the effects of AG and BG herbivores on each other, underlying patterns have been difficult to identify due to a high degree of context dependency. In this study, we present the first quantitative meta-analysis of AG and BG herbivore interactions. Previous global predictions, specifically that BG herbivores normally promoted AG herbivore performance and AG herbivores normally reduced BG herbivore performance, were not supported. Instead, the meta-analysis identified four factors that determined the outcome of AG-BG interactions. (1) Sequence of herbivore arrival on host plants was important, with BG herbivores promoting AG herbivore performance only when introduced to the plant simultaneously, whereas AG herbivores had negative effects on BG herbivores only when introduced first. (2) AG herbivores negatively affected BG herbivore survival but tended to increase population growth rates. (3) AG herbivores negatively affected BG herbivore performance on annual plants, but not on perennials, and these effects were observed more consistently in laboratory than field studies. (4) The type of herbivore was also important, with BG insect herbivores belonging to the order Diptera (i.e., true flies) having the strongest negative effects on AG herbivores. Coleoptera (i.e., beetles) species were the most widely investigated BG herbivores and had positive impacts on AG Homoptera (e.g., aphids), but negative effects on AG Hymenoptera (e.g., sawflies). The strongest negative outcomes for BG herbivores were seen when the AG herbivore was a Coleoptera species. We found no evidence for publication bias in AG-BG herbivore interaction literature and conclude that several biological and experimental factors are important for predicting the outcome of AG-BG herbivore interactions. The sequence of herbivore arrival on the host plant was among the most influential.
研究地上(AG)和地下(BG)食草动物之间的相互作用一直是描述陆地生态系统中 AG-BG 联系的核心,其中许多相互作用构成了跨越两个子系统的复杂食物网的基础。尽管关于 AG 和 BG 食草动物相互作用的文献越来越多,但由于高度依赖背景,很难确定潜在模式。在这项研究中,我们首次对 AG 和 BG 食草动物的相互作用进行了定量荟萃分析。以前的全球预测,特别是 BG 食草动物通常促进 AG 食草动物的表现,而 AG 食草动物通常降低 BG 食草动物的表现,并没有得到支持。相反,荟萃分析确定了四个因素决定了 AG-BG 相互作用的结果。(1)食草动物到达宿主植物的顺序很重要,BG 食草动物只有在同时被引入植物时才会促进 AG 食草动物的表现,而 AG 食草动物只有在首先被引入时才会对 BG 食草动物产生负面影响。(2)AG 食草动物对 BG 食草动物的生存有负面影响,但倾向于增加种群增长率。(3)AG 食草动物对一年生植物的 BG 食草动物的表现有负面影响,但对多年生植物没有影响,并且这些影响在实验室研究中比野外研究中更为一致。(4)食草动物的类型也很重要,BG 昆虫食草动物属于目 Diptera(即真正的苍蝇)对 AG 食草动物的负面影响最大。Coleoptera(即甲虫)物种是研究最广泛的 BG 食草动物,对 AG Homoptera(如蚜虫)有积极影响,但对 AG Hymenoptera(如锯蝇)有负面影响。当 AG 食草动物是 Coleoptera 物种时,BG 食草动物的负面结果最强。我们没有发现 AG-BG 食草动物相互作用文献中存在发表偏差的证据,并得出结论,几个生物学和实验因素对于预测 AG-BG 食草动物相互作用的结果很重要。食草动物到达宿主植物的顺序是最具影响力的因素之一。