Lyden Catherine M, Kramlich Debra, Groves Rachel, Bagwell Sandra P
Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA.
Pediatr Nurs. 2012 Sep-Oct;38(5):278-84.
No "gold standard" currently exists for the objective assessment of sedation depth in critically ill pediatric patients requiring mechanical ventilation. The risks for these patients due to both over-sedation and under-sedation include poorer outcomes, reduced patient and family satisfaction, and increased costs to the institutions. Available tools were unsatisfactory for the authors' patient population and practice model. The purpose of this study was to assess the content validity of the Pediatric Sedation-Agitation Scale (P-SAS), which was adapted from the Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale (SAS). Analysis by a panel of 30 health care professionals with expertise in pediatric acute care supported the content validity of the P-SAS.
目前,对于需要机械通气的危重症儿科患者的镇静深度,尚无客观评估的“金标准”。这些患者因镇静过度和镇静不足而面临的风险包括预后较差、患者及家属满意度降低以及机构成本增加。现有的工具对于作者所研究的患者群体和实践模式并不适用。本研究的目的是评估从里克尔镇静 - 躁动量表(SAS)改编而来的儿科镇静 - 躁动量表(P - SAS)的内容效度。由30名儿科急性护理领域专家组成的小组进行的分析支持了P - SAS的内容效度。