Suppr超能文献

通过与基于家系的数据比较评估HLA三个基因座单倍型的计算方法

[Evaluation of computational methods for HLA three loci haplotype by compare with family-based data].

作者信息

Tang Min-Zhong, Li Jun, Cai Yong-Lin, Zheng Yu-Ming, Liao Jian, Zeng Hong, O'Brien Stephen, Zeng Yi

机构信息

College of Life Science and Bio-engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100022, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Shi Yan He Lin Chuang Bing Du Xue Za Zhi. 2012 Aug;26(4):288-90.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the accuracy and efficiency of computational inference methods for haplotype on estimate HLA-A-B-C haplotype frequencies by compared with the haplotypes manually defined in a family-base dataset.

METHODS

558 individuals with pedigree information were selected, and their haplotyps were compared with the data obtained by the following three method: the Expectation-Maximization (EM) and Excoffier-Laval-Balding (ELB)algorithms using the AELEQUIN software, and the SAS/Genetics PROC HAPLOTYPE method.

RESULTS

After performing the SAS/Genetics method, and the Expectation-Maximization (EM) and Excoffier-Laval-Balding (ELB) algorithms using the AELEQUIN software, 248, 247, and 238 different haplotypes were obtained respectively. The accuracy rates of these three methods were 88.5%, 89.1%, and 90.3% respectively. There are no significant different in the accuracy and estimated haplotype frequency comparisons among any two of these computational inference methods.

CONCLUSION

High accuracy haplotype frequency estimate rates could be obtained by these three computational inference methods, and there are no significant difference in the comparison of haplotypes estimated by SAS/Genetics, the EM and ELB algorithms using the AELEQUIN software. However, ELB algorithm shows better performance than EM algorithm and SAS/Genetics PROC HAPLOTYPE method for haplotype frequencies estimation in general.

摘要

目的

通过与基于家系数据集中手动定义的单倍型进行比较,评估计算推断方法估计HLA - A - B - C单倍型频率的准确性和效率。

方法

选择558名有谱系信息的个体,并将他们的单倍型与通过以下三种方法获得的数据进行比较:使用AELEQUIN软件的期望最大化(EM)和Excoffier - Laval - Balding(ELB)算法,以及SAS/Genetics PROC HAPLOTYPE方法。

结果

在执行SAS/Genetics方法、使用AELEQUIN软件的期望最大化(EM)和Excoffier - Laval - Balding(ELB)算法后,分别获得了248、247和238种不同的单倍型。这三种方法的准确率分别为88.5%、89.1%和90.3%。在这些计算推断方法中的任意两种之间,准确性和估计单倍型频率比较没有显著差异。

结论

这三种计算推断方法可以获得较高的单倍型频率估计率,并且在比较SAS/Genetics、使用AELEQUIN软件的EM和ELB算法估计的单倍型时没有显著差异。然而,总体而言,ELB算法在单倍型频率估计方面比EM算法和SAS/Genetics PROC HAPLOTYPE方法表现更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验