• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像对胰腺良性囊性肿瘤进行形态学分析与鉴别

Morphological analysis and differentiation of benign cystic neoplasms of the pancreas using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

作者信息

Grieser C, Heine G, Stelter L, Steffen I G, Rothe J H, Walter T C, Fischer C, Bahra M, Denecke T

机构信息

Klinik für Radiologie, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin.

出版信息

Rofo. 2013 Mar;185(3):219-27. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1325551. Epub 2012 Nov 29.

DOI:10.1055/s-0032-1325551
PMID:23196834
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate morphologic characteristics and establish a standardized diagnostic algorithm to differentiate benign cystic pancreatic tumors (CPTs) in non-pancreatitis patients using multidetector computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with histopathologically proven CPTs who had undergone MRI and/or CT and subsequent tumor resection in our institution were retrospectively identified. Images were analyzed for morphology and enhancement patterns by three independent blinded observers. Preoperative image findings were correlated with histopathological results. Based on the evaluated morphologic parameters, a standardized diagnostic algorithm was designed to help characterize the lesions.

RESULTS

A total of 62 consecutive patients with 64 CPTs were identified from the surgical database (21 intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms; 10 mucinous cystic neoplasms; 12 serous microcystic adenomas; 3 serous oligocystic adenomas; 6 solid pseudopapillary tumors; 12 neuroendocrine neoplasms). The overall averaged accuracy for the 3 observers was 89.9 % for CT and 93.1 % for MRI with increasing overall accuracy in relation to the experience of the observer (88.2 %, 91.5 %, and 93.8 %, respectively). Overall, the generalized kappa value was 0.69 (CT, 0.64; MRI, 0.76); p < 0.001). The accuracy of the standardized diagnostic algorithm was 91.1 %.

CONCLUSION

It is possible to characterize benign CPTs with MRI and CT, while MRI appears to be superior to CT. Diagnostic accuracy depends on the observer's experience. The standardized algorithm can aid in the differential diagnosis but still needs to be tested in other patient populations.

摘要

目的

利用多排螺旋计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)评估非胰腺炎患者良性胰腺囊性肿瘤(CPT)的形态学特征,并建立标准化诊断算法以鉴别此类肿瘤。

材料与方法

回顾性纳入我院经组织病理学证实为CPT且接受过MRI和/或CT检查及后续肿瘤切除的患者。由三名独立的盲法观察者分析图像的形态和强化模式。将术前图像表现与组织病理学结果进行关联。基于评估的形态学参数,设计标准化诊断算法以帮助对病变进行特征性描述。

结果

从手术数据库中识别出62例连续患者的64个CPT(21例导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤;10例黏液性囊性肿瘤;12例浆液性微囊性腺瘤;3例浆液性少囊性腺瘤;6例实性假乳头状肿瘤;12例神经内分泌肿瘤)。3名观察者对CT的总体平均准确率为89.9%,对MRI为93.1%,且随着观察者经验增加总体准确率提高(分别为88.2%、91.5%和93.8%)。总体而言,广义kappa值为0.69(CT为0.64;MRI为0.76);p<0.001)。标准化诊断算法的准确率为91.1%。

结论

利用MRI和CT可以对良性CPT进行特征性描述,而MRI似乎优于CT。诊断准确性取决于观察者的经验。标准化算法有助于鉴别诊断,但仍需在其他患者群体中进行验证。

相似文献

1
Morphological analysis and differentiation of benign cystic neoplasms of the pancreas using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.利用计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像对胰腺良性囊性肿瘤进行形态学分析与鉴别
Rofo. 2013 Mar;185(3):219-27. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1325551. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
2
Differentiating pancreatic cystic neoplasms from pancreatic pseudocysts at MR imaging: value of perceived internal debris.磁共振成像中胰腺囊性肿瘤与胰腺假性囊肿的鉴别:内部可见碎屑的价值
Radiology. 2009 Apr;251(1):77-84. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2511081286.
3
Diffusion-weighted MRI in the characterization of cystic pancreatic lesions: usefulness of ADC values.弥散加权 MRI 在胰腺囊性病变中的特征描述:ADC 值的应用价值。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Dec;28(10):1447-55. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2010.06.031. Epub 2010 Sep 22.
4
Differentiation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms from other pancreatic cystic masses: comparison of multirow-detector CT and MR imaging using ROC analysis.导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤与其他胰腺囊性肿块的鉴别:使用ROC分析比较多排探测器CT和MR成像
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Jul;26(1):86-93. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21001.
5
Cystic tumors of the pancreas: a radiological perspective.胰腺囊性肿瘤:放射学视角。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2011 Jun;17(2):143-9. doi: 10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.3254-09.1. Epub 2010 Jul 15.
6
MR imaging of cystic lesions of the pancreas.胰腺囊性病变的磁共振成像。
Radiographics. 2009 Oct;29(6):1749-65. doi: 10.1148/rg.296095506.
7
Characterization of cystic pancreatic masses: relative accuracy of CT and MRI.胰腺囊性肿块的特征:CT与MRI的相对准确性
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Sep;189(3):648-56. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2365.
8
New trends in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a tool in differentiation of serous cystadenoma and mucinous cystic tumor: a prospective study.弥散加权磁共振成像在浆液性囊腺瘤和黏液性囊性肿瘤鉴别诊断中的新趋势:一项前瞻性研究。
Pancreatology. 2011;11(1):43-51. doi: 10.1159/000324565. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
9
Preoperative evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous tumors performed by pancreatic magnetic resonance imaging and correlated with surgical and histopathologic findings.通过胰腺磁共振成像对导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤进行术前评估,并与手术及组织病理学结果相关联。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Mar;21(3):237-44. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20254.
10
Another dimension in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.磁共振胰胆管造影的另一个维度:二维与三维磁共振胰胆管造影在评估胰腺导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤中的比较
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009 May-Jun;33(3):363-8. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181852193.

引用本文的文献

1
Radiological Workup of Cystic Neoplasms of the Pancreas.胰腺囊性肿瘤的放射学检查
Visc Med. 2018 Jul;34(3):182-190. doi: 10.1159/000489674. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
2
Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.用于表征胰腺局灶性病变的成像方式。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 17;4(4):CD010213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010213.pub2.
3
The MAPK ERK5, but not ERK1/2, inhibits the progression of monocytic phenotype to the functioning macrophage.丝裂原活化蛋白激酶ERK5而非ERK1/2可抑制单核细胞表型向功能性巨噬细胞的转变。
Exp Cell Res. 2015 Jan 1;330(1):199-211. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.10.003. Epub 2014 Oct 16.