School of Biomedical Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013 Apr;23(2):369-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.10.012. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
Evidence indicates that previous low back injury (LBI) is a strong predictor for re-injury. The purpose of this study was to examine whether neuromuscular patterns remain altered in a LBI group who were deemed recovered. Surface electromyograms from 12-abdominal and 12-back extensors sites and motion variables were recorded from 33 LBI individuals (sub-acute phase) and 54 asymptomatic controls. Pain-related variables were recorded and a clinical assessment performed for LBI participants. Subjects performed a symmetrical lift and replace task in two reaches. Pattern recognition techniques were applied to normalized activation amplitude patterns to extract key recruitment strategies. Mixed model ANOVAs tested for effects (p < 0.05). Despite similar task performance, significantly (p < 0.05) different recruitment strategies were observed for the LBI group. There were higher activation amplitudes for LBI subjects in all muscles (except posterior external oblique) and greater co-activation between abdominal and back extensor sites compared to controls. Local abdominal and back extensor sites showed altered responses to increased physical demands in the LBI group. Despite outcomes indicating recovery, the LBI group had altered neuromuscular patterns compared to asymptomatic controls supporting that residual alterations remain following recovery.
证据表明,先前的下背部损伤(LBI)是再次受伤的强烈预测因素。本研究旨在检查在被认为已康复的 LBI 组中,神经肌肉模式是否仍然存在改变。从 33 名 LBI 个体(亚急性期)和 54 名无症状对照者记录了 12 个腹部和 12 个背部伸肌部位的表面肌电图和运动变量。记录了与疼痛相关的变量,并对 LBI 参与者进行了临床评估。受试者在两个到达点执行对称的提升和替换任务。应用模式识别技术对归一化激活幅度模式进行提取关键募集策略。混合模型方差分析测试效果(p < 0.05)。尽管任务表现相似,但 LBI 组观察到明显(p < 0.05)不同的募集策略。与对照组相比,LBI 受试者的所有肌肉(除后外侧斜肌外)的激活幅度更高,腹部和背部伸肌部位之间的协同激活更多。尽管结果表明已经康复,但与无症状对照组相比,LBI 组的神经肌肉模式发生了改变,这表明康复后仍然存在残留的改变。