Psychology, University of Vermont, 1 South Prospect Street, Burlington, VT 05401, USA.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;51(12):1261-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.09.010.
To review international findings on the prevalence of diagnosed disorders, generalizability of dimensional scales, and distributions of dimensional scores for school-age children and to address the conceptual and clinical issues raised by the findings.
A review of findings for interviews (Development and Well-Being Assessment, Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children) and dimensional rating instruments (Conners Rating Scales, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire [SDQ]) that have been used to assess general population samples of at least 300 children in at least five societies.
Prevalence estimates for diagnosed disorders varied greatly, owing at least in part to methodologic variations. A Goodman five-dimension model for the SDQ received some support, whereas a three-dimension internalizing-externalizing-prosocial model for the SDQ was supported for epidemiologic studies. The SDQ total difficulties scores varied less than the prevalence estimates for diagnoses, but population-specific norms may be needed.
Numerous studies have shown the feasibility of assessing children in diverse societies with diagnostic interviews and dimensional ratings. However, the findings disclose challenges to be met to help clinicians take account of the similarities and differences found for psychopathology in different societies.
回顾国际上关于学龄儿童诊断障碍的患病率、维度量表的可推广性以及维度得分分布的研究结果,并探讨这些发现所提出的概念和临床问题。
综述了用于评估至少五个社会中至少 300 名儿童的一般人群样本的访谈(发展和健康评估、儿童诊断访谈表)和维度评分工具(康纳斯评定量表、长处和困难问卷[SDQ])的研究结果。
诊断障碍的患病率估计差异很大,至少部分原因是方法学的差异。SDQ 的 Goodman 五维度模型得到了一定的支持,而 SDQ 的三维度内化-外化-亲社会模型则得到了流行病学研究的支持。SDQ 的总困难得分变化小于诊断的患病率估计,但可能需要特定于人群的规范。
许多研究表明,使用诊断访谈和维度评分评估不同社会中的儿童是可行的。然而,这些发现揭示了需要应对的挑战,以帮助临床医生考虑不同社会中精神病理学的相似性和差异。