Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Feb;77(2):233-40. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.09.036. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
Chromo-zoom endoscopy has been demonstrated to be valuable in assessing the degree of intestinal villous atrophy in patients with suspected celiac disease.
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of chromo-zoom endoscopy in patients with difficult diagnosis because of nonconcordant test results and/or the confounding of a gluten-free diet initiated before an appropriate diagnosis of celiac disease and to compare the findings to a recent reference standard, the in vitro gliadin challenge test.
Prospective, case-control study.
Tertiary-care referral hospital.
Patients without celiac disease (negative control group, n = 9), patients with celiac disease (positive control group, n = 41), and patients with difficult diagnosis (n = 27).
Chromo-endoscopy with indigo carmine and endoscopic zoom-magnification were performed. Duodenal fragments were collected for the in vitro gliadin challenge test. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used for statistical analyses on accuracy.
Diagnostic accuracy of chromo-zoom endoscopy for detection of mucosal abnormalities in patients with difficult diagnosis.
Chromo-zoom endoscopy had a high accuracy for celiac disease diagnosis in analyses on negative controls and positive controls (area under roc = 0.99). In the difficult diagnosis group, the accuracy of chromo-zoom endoscopy was lower (area under roc = 0.83), but it increased after exclusion of patients with celiac disease on gluten-free diet (area under roc = 0.88).
There was a 4% failure rate in the ability to cultivate biopsies. Also, the study was done at an academic medical center.
Chromo-zoom endoscopy has high accuracy for cases of difficult diagnosis of celiac disease but only in untreated patients with celiac disease.
显色放大内镜在评估疑似乳糜泻患者的肠绒毛萎缩程度方面具有重要价值。
评估显色放大内镜在因检测结果不一致和/或在乳糜泻适当诊断前开始无麸质饮食而导致诊断困难的患者中的诊断准确性,并将其结果与最近的参考标准——体外麦胶蛋白挑战试验进行比较。
前瞻性病例对照研究。
三级转诊医院。
无乳糜泻患者(阴性对照组,n=9)、乳糜泻患者(阳性对照组,n=41)和诊断困难患者(n=27)。
进行染色放大内镜检查,并使用靛胭脂和内镜缩放放大技术。收集十二指肠片段进行体外麦胶蛋白挑战试验。使用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积进行统计分析以评估准确性。
诊断困难患者的显色放大内镜对黏膜异常的诊断准确性。
在阴性对照和阳性对照的分析中,显色放大内镜对乳糜泻的诊断具有很高的准确性(ROC 下面积=0.99)。在诊断困难组中,显色放大内镜的准确性较低(ROC 下面积=0.83),但在排除无麸质饮食的乳糜泻患者后,准确性增加(ROC 下面积=0.88)。
有 4%的活检培养失败率。此外,该研究是在学术医疗中心进行的。
显色放大内镜对乳糜泻诊断困难的病例具有很高的准确性,但仅适用于未经治疗的乳糜泻患者。